In USCCB debate, Chaput defends prioritizing fight against abortion

Baltimore, Md., Nov 12, 2019 / 01:20 pm (CNA).- The U.S. Catholic bishops approved a letter to supplement their voting document on Tuesday—but not without controversy during debate on the “preeminent priority” of abortion.

During discussion at the bishops’ annual fall meeting in Baltimore on a letter to accompany the bishops’ document on voting, “Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship,” the bishops considered whether to include an entire paragraph from Pope Francis’ 2018 apostolic exhortation on holiness, Gaudete et Exsultate.

Bishop Robert McElroy of San Diego said that paragraph should be included to make clear that Pope Francis prioritizes other issues at the same level as abortion.

The U.S. bishops’ inclusion of the word “preeminent” before mention of abortion in another part of the letter, he said, “is a statement that I believe is at least discordant with the Pope’s teaching, if not inconsistent,” and one that “will be used to, in fact, undermine the point Pope Francis is making.”

“It is not Catholic teaching that abortion is the preeminent issue that we face in the world of Catholic social teaching. It is not,” McElroy said, adding that to teach otherwise would provide “a grave disservice” to the faithful.

After McElroy spoke, Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas said, “I absolutely think ‘preeminent’ needs to stay.”

Archbishop Charles Chaput of Philadelphia rose to say that he did not oppose the inclusion of the full statement of Pope Francis, but added that teaching that abortion is a “preeminent” issue is not contrary to the magisterium of Pope Francis.

“I am certainly not against quoting the Holy Father’s full statement, I think it’s a beautiful statement, I believe it,” he said.

“But I am against anyone stating that our stating it [abortion] is ‘preeminent’ is contrary to the teaching of the pope. That isn’t true. That sets up an artificial battle between the bishops’ conference of the United States and the Holy Father, which isn’t true,” Chaput said.

“I think it’s been a very clearly articulated opinion of the bishops’ conference for many years that pro-life is still the pre-eminent issue. It doesn’t mean the others aren’t equal in dignity,” he said.

Many bishops in the audience applauded after Chaput finished his statement.

The U.S. bishops on Tuesday met for the second day of their annual fall meeting in Baltimore, Maryland, held from November 11-14. The meeting agenda included the elections of a new conference president and vice president and six committee chairs.

On Tuesday morning, the bishops elected standing vice president Archbishop Jose Gomez of Los Angeles as the conference’s first Hispanic president. Archbishop Allen Vigneron of Detroit was elected as the vice president on the third ballot.

Later on Tuesday, the bishops voted to approve both a script for a short video on their voting document “Faithful Citizenship,” as well as a short letter to accompany the document, amendments to which were considered by the U.S. bishops’ Working Group on “Forming Consciences on Faithful Citizenship.”

Cardinal Blase Cupich had proposed an amendment to add the whole paragraph 101 from “Gaudete et Exsultate” into the letter.

The amendment had been accepted by the working committee with the changes that some, but not all, of the language of the paragraph would be included.

The reason the entire paragraph was not included was the need for brevity in the letter, Archbishop Gomez—the incoming president of the conference—later said, in the discussions on the language.

A footnote to the exhortation was included to draw attention to the Holy Father’s message, Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone of San Francisco later said.

While the original discussion centered upon the inclusion of Cupich’s amendment, it triggered a debate over the inclusion of the word “preeminent” in mentioning abortion among other issues. Archbishop Joseph Naumann, chair of the U.S. bishops’ pro-life committee, had successfully included an amendment inserting the word “preeminent” before the mention of the abortion in the letter, to recognize its special gravity when considered with other issues voters are considering.

Cupich said that Pope Francis, in his exhortation on holiness, “makes sure that we do not make one issue that a political party or a group puts forward to the point where we’re going to ignore all the rest.”

The pope’s warning against the coexistence of consumerism with poverty, for instance, was not included in the voting letter, Cupich said, and the entire paragraph should be included for that reason.

Bishop Frank Dewane, who led the working group on “Faithful Citizenship,” proposed a compromise to include more language recognizing those issues Pope Francis mentioned in his exhortation, but Cupich said that he wanted the entire paragraph included.

“This is the magisterial teaching of Pope Francis put in a very succinct way, and I think we can all benefit from it as we speak to our people about the issues,” Cupich said.

Bishop Robert McElroy of San Diego then made his intervention, with Strickland and Chaput responding.

The bishops then voted to keep the letter as is—without Cupich’s amendment to insert the entire paragraph into the text—with 143 members of the conference in support. Sixty-nine members voted in favor of Cupich’s motion, with four abstentions.

After that vote, the bishops voted on the final text of the letter, with 207 conference members voting in favor, 24 voting against, and five abstaining.

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


  1. “San Diego Bishop Robert McElroy said he supports allowing women to serve as deacons in the Catholic Church”
    “McElroy, one of three U.S. bishops to participate in the Oct. 6-27 Amazon synod”

    “It took all of six minutes for San Diego Bishop Robert McElroy to rouse a crowd of nearly 700 community organizers and social justice “protagonistas” by calling them to become disrupters and rebuilders amid current American politics.”

    “San Diego Bishop Robert McElroy is calling on his city’s priests to embrace “LGBT families,” and to allow divorced and remarried Catholics to receive Communion in certain cases.”

    Yeah, I’m so surprised.

  2. It is the atheists who believe that humanity is just some stuff quite accidentally vomited forth by mindless, purposeless natural processes, and therefore life is all about the survival of the fittest and the pursuit of power and pleasure. That’s it. There is no such thing as the God-given, inalienable rights of humanity, or objective morality for that matter. If all that is true then it is no big deal that worldwide, two-billion innocent human beings have been murdered through “legal” abortion in the last fifty years. Humanity is as disposable as garbage, and the state does indeed have the authority to “legalize” the murder of innocent humanity as a matter of social policy.

    If all that isn’t true then we are in the midst of the greatest and most evil holocaust of innocent humanity in the history of the world. It persists, no doubt, because militant atheism has replaced Christianity as the moral guide for Western nations. If the bishops assume the complacency of the world regarding this holocaust, behaving as though it isn’t really all that important, then they undermine the basis for all Catholic Social Teaching, which is the inestimable value, inherent dignity and God-given, inalienable rights of every human being, each one a precious child of God. Why should anybody be concerned with the plight of migrants or the poor if humanity is just disposable garbage?

    If the correction of an evil that undermines all of Catholic Social Teaching, not to mention the fact that it is also is an assault on Christianity in that the atheistic state demands that Christians idolatrously render unto it authority over innocent human life that belongs to God alone, isn’t the preeminent issue, then the atheists are right.

    It looks like one third of the bishops (who insist Bergoglio agrees with them) think the atheists are right.

  3. Yada yada yada yada, dialogue, discussions, prayerful discussions, yada yada yada, etc.

    Nothing changes, more and more empty pews, less and less in the collection plate, yada yada yada, etc, Headline – Bishop Malone criticized for $200,000 house renovation.


    Dialogue, statements issued, yada yada – MEANWHILE – Ted Lieu congressman from California tweets that he is in opposition to just about every principle that we hold dear and he DARES anyone to deny him communion.


4 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. In USCCB debate, Chaput defends prioritizing fight against abortion - Catholic Daily
  2. Why the issue of abortion is still the preeminent priority – Catholic World Report
  3. Why the issue of abortion is still the preeminent priority - Catholic Daily
  4. Should the Church be Saving Souls or Saving Society? – chaos

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.