Netflix has just released a trailer for the original film The Two Popes, starring Anthony Hopkins as Pope Benedict XVI and Jonathan Pryce as Pope Francis. I plan to watch despite the predictable sermons on the Church’s need to embrace modernity, as majestic scenes from Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel are used as an ironic backdrop. But Hopkins is a master, so I am curious about his portrayal of Benedict XVI.
The Two Popes promises to be the latest example of how the entertainment industry routinely bets on the trappings of traditional Catholicism to sell movie tickets and bolster television ratings. This speaks volumes about the power of traditional aesthetics and the inadequacy of modern church aesthetics.
The 2018 Met Gala, with the theme “Heavenly Bodies: Fashion and the Catholic Imagination,” was another prime example of this. While it was puzzling to hear a defense of Jared Leto imitating a priest in beautiful vestments on the red carpet from some of the very people who decry clericalism whenever real priests wear traditional vestments, it was clear that pre-conciliar aesthetics can draw people to museums and sell fashion magazines, and that even stylish celebrities might want to “engage” with it.
The Catholic Church, through the lens of Hollywood anyway, is still in 1566. Nuns wear habits, altars are bedecked in gold, and the air is perfumed by incense and chant. Simply put, traditional Catholicism provides a more attractive setting than modern Catholic churches, starkly decorated and doused in taupe (and everyone knows it).
HBO has no interest in our modern church aesthetics either. Its 2016 series The Young Pope starred Jude Law as Pope Pius XIII, a staunch traditionalist whose knowing wink in the opening credits was the face that launched a thousand traditionalist memes. Donning a papal tiara, fanned with ostrich flabella, and bestriding the sedia gestatoria, Law’s character felt strangely like an inside joke between secular media and young traditionalists, who shared a whispered giggle about the pending decline of Baby Boomer hegemony.
Liberals and traditionalists essentially agreed that The Young Pope was a visual delight, but also that it was just plain weird. It felt as if somebody whipped up a program about papal intrigue, solely as a vehicle to display the stunning iconography of traditional Catholicism. I expect the next installment, The New Pope, which adds John Malkovich and will include a cameo by Marilyn Manson, will involve another bizarre storyline, randomly peppered with obscurant sequences, and abundantly punctuated by sacred eye-candy.
In good conscience, I cannot recommend anyone sit down with their families and watch these programs. But we should take note that what seems like Hollywood mockery often betrays an odd, inverted reverence for traditional aesthetics, and a subtle bow to the compelling beauty of Catholicism.
Regardless of whether you are liturgically liberal or traditional, secular fascination with traditionalism raises important questions. Why is it that our sacred music belongs in concert halls, but not at Sunday Mass? And why should our patrimony of sacred objects be admired in museums, film, and television, but neither worn by our priests nor brought forth to adorn our altars?
Why are traditional aesthetics appreciated more by secular media than in our own churches? Truthfully, when I walk into a modern church, punished by folk music, battered by felt banners, crestfallen at the sight of a prosaic altar table buried under potted plants that might have been swiped from my dentist’s waiting room, it is hard to blame Hollywood for trivializing Catholicism. We seem to be doing a bang-up job on our own.
Despite how Catholicism is portrayed, most practicing Catholics are too young to remember any sacred music that predates John Michael Talbot. Then again, there was that album, Chant, from the mid-1990s, which sold millions and launched plainsong to the top of the charts. A few years later I was a teenager going through a confirmation program. On a weekend retreat, the youth ministry band scourged us with “Ice, Ice, Baby,” replacing “ice” with “Christ.” This was well after Vanilla Ice had become a cultural punchline, a fact somehow lost on the “youth ministers.” But I suppose the fact that nobody listens to folk hymns anymore has likewise evaded a couple generations of parish music directors.
We look around at the emptying pews and blame the abuse scandals, clerical hypocrisy, or so-called doctrinal rigidity. Yet the Church has been plagued by scandalous, hypocritical, and deviant clerics since Judas. We have had doctrinal debates explode into religious wars. But Mass attendance, baptisms, weddings, vocations, and all other signs of regular practice have never collapsed as they have since the 1960s. Is it very surprising? Far more inexplicable than most of my cohort never again setting foot inside a Catholic church after hearing “Christ, Christ, Baby,” is my own decision to remain in a Church that insists on rejecting her own vibrant beauty and tradition.
While traditional aesthetics suggest the unity of truth and beauty, modern church aesthetics make it nearly impossible to spot the connection. How many from my generation were simply repelled by banality?
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
MPAA Rating: PG-13 USCCB Rating: A-III Reel Rating: 2 out of 5 reels This version of The Mummy is the second remake of the 1932 original, and theoretically it is the first in a reboot […]
Maureen McKinley milks one of her family’s goats in their backyard with help from three of her children, Madeline (behind), Fiona and Augustine on Monday, Aug. 2, 2021. McKinley and her family own two goats, chickens, a rabbit, and a dog. / Jake Kelly
Denver Newsroom, Aug 10, 2021 / 16:32 pm (CNA).
With five children ages 10 and under to care for, and a pair of goats, a rabbit, chickens and a dog to tend to, Maureen and Matt McKinley rely on a structured routine to keep their busy lives on track.
Chores, nap times, scheduled story hours – they’re all important staples of their day. But the center of the McKinleys’ routine, what focuses their family life and strengthens their Catholic faith, they say, is the Traditional Latin Mass.
Its beauty, reverence, and timelessness connect them to a rich liturgical legacy that dates back centuries.
“This is the Mass that made so many saints throughout time,” observes Maureen, 36, a parishioner at Mater Misericordiæ Catholic Church in Phoenix.
“You know what Mass St. Alphonsus Ligouri, St. Therese, St. Teresa of Avila and St. Augustine were attending? The Traditional Latin Mass,” Maureen says.
“We could have a conversation about it, and we would have all experienced the exact same thing,” she says. “That’s exciting.”
Recent developments in the Catholic Church, however, have curbed some of that excitement. On July 16, Pope Francis released a motu proprio titled Traditiones custodis, or “Guardians of the Tradition”, that has cast doubt on the future of the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM) – and deeply upset and confused many of its devotees.
Pope Francis’ directive rescinds the freedom Pope Benedict XVI granted to priests 14 years ago to say Masses using the Roman Missal of 1962, the form of liturgy prior to Vatican II, without first seeking their bishop’s approval. Under the new rules, bishops now have the “exclusive competence” to decide where, when, and whether the TLM can be said in their dioceses.
In a letter accompanying the motu proprio, Pope Francis maintains that the faculties granted to priests by his predecessor have been “exploited to widen the gaps, reinforce the divergences, and encourage disagreements that injure the Church, block her path, and expose her to the peril of division.”
Using the word “unity” a total of 15 times in the accompanying letter, the pope suggests that attending the TLM is anything but unifying, going so far as to correlate a strong personal preference for such masses with a rejection of Vatican II.
Weeks later, many admirers of the “extraordinary” form of the Roman rite – the McKinleys among them – are still struggling to wrap their minds and hearts around the pope’s order, and the pointed tone he used to deliver it.
Maureen McKinley says she had never considered herself a “traditionalist Catholic” before. Instead, she says she and her husband have just “always moved toward the most reverent way to worship and the best way to teach our children.”
“It didn’t feel like I became a particular type of Catholic by going to Mater Misericordiæ. But since the motu proprio came out, I feel like I have been categorized, like I was something different, something other than the rest of the Church,” she says.
“It feels like our Holy Father doesn’t understand this whole group of people who love our Lord so much.”
McKinley isn’t alone in feeling this way. Sadness, anger, frustration, and disbelief are some common themes in conversations among those who regularly attend the TLM.
They want to understand and support the Holy Father, but they also see the restriction as unnecessary, especially when plenty of other more pressing issues in the Church abound.
Eric Matthews, another Mater Misericordiæ parishioner, views the new restrictions as an “attack on devout Catholic culture,” citing the beauty that exists across the rites recognized within the Church. There are seven rites recognized in the Catholic Church: Latin, Byzantine, Alexandrian or Coptic, Syriac, Armenian, Maronite, and Chaldean.
“It’s the same Mass,” says Matthews, 39, who first discovered the TLM about eight years ago. “It’s just different languages, different cultures, but the people that you have there are there for the right reasons.”
Different paths to the TLM
The pope’s motu proprio directly affects a tiny fraction of U.S. Catholics – perhaps as few as 150,000, or less than 1 percent of some 21 million regular Mass-goers, according to some estimates. According to one crowd-sourced database, only about 700 venues – compared to over 16,700 parishes nationwide – offer the TLM.
Also, since the motu proprio’s release July 16, only a handful of bishops have stopped the TLM in their dioceses. Of those bishops who have made public responses, most are allowing the Masses to continue as before – in some cases because they see no evidence of disunity, and in others because they need more time to study the issue.
But for those who feel drawn to the TLM – for differing reasons that have nothing to do with a rejection of Vatican II – it feels as if the ground has shifted under their feet.
Maureen McKinley wants her children to understand the importance of hard work, of which they have no shortage when it comes to their urban farm. After morning prayer, Maureen milks the family’s goats with the help of the children. Madeline (age 10) feeds the bunny; Augustine (7) exercises the dog; John (6) checks for eggs from the chickens; and Michael (4) helps anyone he chooses.
With a noisy clatter in the kitchen, the McKinleys eat breakfast, tidy up their rooms, and begin their daily activities. They break at 11 a.m. to head to daily Mass at Mater Misericordiæ, an apostolate of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter (FSSP), where they first attended two years ago.
Matt, 34, wanted to know how the early Christians worshipped.
“The funny thing about converts is they’re always wanting more,” says Maureen, who was, at first, a little resistant to the idea of attending the TLM because she didn’t know Latin. “Worship was a big part of his conversion.”
Maureen agreed to follow her husband’s lead, and they continued to attend the TLM. What kept them coming back week after week was the reverence for the Eucharist.
“Matt had a really hard time watching so many people receive communion in the hand at the other parish,” says Maureen. “He says he didn’t want our kids to think that that was the standard. That’s the exception to the rule, not the rule.”
Reverence in worship also drew Elizabeth Sisk to the TLM. A 28-year-old post-anesthesia care unit nurse, she attends both the Novus Ordo, the Mass promulgated by St. Paul VI in 1969, and the extraordinary form in Raleigh, North Carolina, where her parish, the Holy Name of Jesus Cathedral, offers the TLM on the first Sunday of the month.
Sisk has noticed recently that more people in her area — especially young people who are converts to Catholicism — are attending both forms of the Mass. While the Novus Ordo is what brought many of them, herself included, to the faith, she feels that the extraordinary form invites them to go deeper.
“We want to do something radical with our lives,” Sisk says. “To be Catholic right now as a young person is a really radical decision. I think the people who choose to be Catholic right now, we’re all in. We don’t want ‘watered-down’ Catholicism.”
With the lack of Christian values in the world today, Sisk desires “something greater,” which she says she can tell is happening in the TLM.
Many TLM parishes saw an increase in attendance during the pandemic, as they were often the only churches open while many others shut their doors or held Masses outside. This struck some as controversial, if not disobedient to the local government. For others, it was a saving grace to have access to the sacraments.
The priests at Erin Hanson’s parish obtained permission from the local bishop to celebrate Mass all day, every day, with 10 parishioners at a time during the height of the COVID pandemic.
“We were being told by the world that church is not necessary,” says Hanson, a 39-year-old mother of three. “Our priest says, ‘No, that’s a lie. Our church is essential. Our salvation is essential. The sacraments are essential.’”
Andy Stevens, 52, came into the Church through the TLM, much to the surprise of his wife, Emma, who had been a practicing Catholic for many years. Andy was “very adamantly not going to become Catholic,” but was happy to help Emma with their children at Mass. It wasn’t until they attended a TLM that Andy began to think differently about the Church.
“He believed that you die and then there is nothing, and he never really spoke to me about becoming a Catholic,” says Emma, 48, who was pregnant with their seventh child at the time.
Andy noticed an intense focus among the worshippers, which he recognized as a “real presence of God” that he didn’t see anywhere else. After the birth of their 7th child, he joined the Church.
All 12 of the Stevens’ children prefer the TLM to the Novus Ordo.
“It’s a Mass of the ages,” says their eldest son, Ryan, 27. “I can feel the veil between heaven and earth palpably thinner.”
A native of Chicago, Adriel Gonzalez, 33, remembers attending the TLM as a child, which he did not particularly like. It was “very long, very boring,” and the people who went to the TLM were “very stiff and they could come off as judgmental” towards his family, he says.
Gonzalez, who also attended Mass in Spanish with his family, didn’t understand the differences among rites, since Chicago was a sort of “salad bowl, ethnically,” he says, and Mass was celebrated in many languages and forms.
He took a step back from faith for some time, he says, noting that he had a “respectability issue” with the Christianity he grew up with. He watched as some of his friends were either thoughtless in the way they practiced their faith, or were “on fire,” but lacked intentionality. When he did come back to the faith, it was through learning about the Church’s intellectual tradition.
He spent time in monasteries and Eastern Catholic parishes with the Divine Liturgy because there was “something so obviously ancient about it.” He decided to stay within the Roman rite with a preference for a reverent Novus Ordo.
When he moved to Ann Arbor, Michigan, Gonzalez committed to his neighborhood parish, which had a strong contingent of people who loved tradition in general. The parish instituted a TLM in the fall of 2020, when they started having Mass indoors again after the pandemic.
“If I’m at a Latin Mass, I’m more likely to get a sense that this is a time-honored practice, something that has been honed over the millennia,” he says. “There is clearly a love affair going on here with the Lord that requires this much more elaborate song and dance.”
For Eric Matthews, the TLM feels a little like time travel.
“It could be medieval times, it could be the enlightenment period, it could be the early 1900s, and the experience is going to be so similar,” he says.
“I just feel like that’s that universal timeframe – not just the universal Church in 2021 – but the universal Church in almost any time period. We’re the only church that can claim that.”
What happens now?
The motu proprio caught Adriel Gonzalez’ attention. He sought clarity about whether his participation in the extraordinary form was, in fact, part of a divisive movement, or simply an expression of his faith.
If it was a movement, he wanted no part of it, he says.
“As far as I can tell, the Church considers the extraordinary form and the ordinary form equal and valid,” says Gonzalez. “Ideally, there should be no true difference between going to one or the other, outside of just preference. It shouldn’t constitute a completely different reality within Catholicism.”
With this understanding, Gonzalez says he resonated with some of the reasoning set forth in the motu proprio because it articulated that the celebration of the TLM was never intended to be a movement away from the Novus Ordo or Vatican II. Gonzalez also emphasized that the extraordinary form was never supposed to be a “superior” way of celebrating the Mass.
Gonzalez believes the Lord allowed the growth in the TLM “to help us to recover a love for liturgy, and to ask questions about what worship and liturgy looks like.” He would have preferred if what was good was kept and encouraged, and what was potentially dangerous “coaxed out and called out.”
Erin Hanson, of Mater Misericordiæ, agrees.
“If [Pope Francis] does believe there is division between Novus Ordo and traditional Catholics, I don’t think he did anything to try to fix that division,” she says.
Hanson would like to know who the bishops are that Pope Francis consulted in making this decision, sharing that she doesn’t feel that there is any of the transparency needed for such a major document. If there are divisions, she says, she would like the opportunity to work on them in a different way.
“This isn’t going to be any less divisive if he causes a possible schism,” Hanson says.
According to the motu proprio and the accompanying letter, the TLM is not to be celebrated in diocesan churches or in new churches constructed for the purpose of the TLM, nor should new groups be established by the bishops. Left out of their parish churches, some are worried their only option to attend Mass will be in a recreation center or hotel ballroom.
Eric Matthews hopes that everyone is able to experience the extraordinary form at least once in their life so they can know that this is not about division.
“I can’t imagine someone going to the Latin Mass and saying, ‘This is creating disunity,’” he says. “There’s nothing to be afraid of with the Latin Mass. You’re just going to be surrounding yourself with people that really take it to heart.”
Maureen McKinley was home sick when her husband Matt found out about the motu proprio. He had taken the kids to a neighborhood park, where he ran into some friends who also attend Mater Misericordiæ. They asked if he had heard the news.
“I felt disgust at a document that pretends to say so much while actually saying so little and disregards the Church’s very long and rich tradition of careful legal documents,” Matt McKinley says.
Bishop Thomas Olmsted of Phoenix stated that the TLM may continue at Mater Misericordiæ, as well as in chapels, oratories, mission churches, non-parochial churches, and at seven other parishes in the diocese. Participation in the TLM and all of the activities of the parish are so important to the McKinleys that they are willing to move to another state or city should further restrictions be implemented.
For now, their family’s routine continues the same as before.
At the end of their day, the McKinleys pray a family rosary in front of their home altar, which has a Bible at the center, and an icon of Christ and a statue of the Virgin Mary. They eat dinner together, milk the goat again, and take care of their evening animal chores. After night prayer, the kids head off to bed, blessing themselves with holy water from the fonts mounted on the wall before they enter their bedroom.
“The life of the Church springs from this Mass,” Maureen says. “That’s why we’re here—not because the Latin Mass is archaic, but that it’s actually just so alive.”
William Friedkin’s The Exorcist is the most famous horror movie that is also explicitly Catholic. The film, which turned 45 this year, was written by William Peter Blatty from his own novel—he won the Oscar […]
23 Comments
From a scriptural angle, what your article describes (the decline of the Catholic Church) is explained by St. Paul. When looking to the future of the Church, St. Paul spoke of a future “apostasy” (i.e., loss of faith, apostasia in the original Greek) and the revelation of the “lawless one” (2 Thess 2: 2-8). St. Paul even gives the reason that this would take place: “they have not accepted the love of truth so that they may be saved” (2 Thess 2: 10). This diabolical dimension explains the fury and Pharisaical self-righteousness of the secularists in their desire to eliminate anything religious. They are under the spell of the Father of Lies who hides behind expressions like “mercy killing” to eclipse the truth about the evil involved. Like Peter in the courtyard, too many of our ecclesiastics today are in effect denying Christ because of their fear of the (earthly) consequences. Nevertheless, St. Paul in the same passage also predicts the victory of goodness through the “breath” (Holy Spirit) of Jesus which in some mysterious way will reverse the situation. At Fatima, Mary basically repeats what St. Paul said with his prediction, saying that after the chaos she warned us of, “My Immaculate Heart will triumph and a time of peace will be granted to the world.” She asked especially for the prayer of the rosary and reparation for sin as our indispensable contribution to hastening the day of the triumph that does require human cooperation with heaven’s merciful designs.
I have witnessed the iconoclasm and utter ugliness of “the spirit of the great deform” from the moment I saw my first ugly “folk mass,” whenever the first “performance” was “staged” (was it 1968-69, or 1970?).
Our so-called “Roman” Catholic Church, in the US (and around the world) is controlled by Bishops, priests and self-styled “trained liturgists” who obviously have CONTEMPT for Roman Catholic tradition and culture (they have the same contempt as Msgr. Bugnini, their psychological master of Iconoclasm).
The Church I was born into is the Church of 2000 years of cultural endowment. They stole that from me and my family and children, and substituted their “folk-cult” fabricated in the 1970s, by now “ex-Jesuit” priests who lived double lives, and similar non-catholic and in-Catholic “artists.”
Junk cult.
It is the Church of McCarrick and his “McCarrick Establishment:” an ugly counterfeit.
My experience has been the same. As a very young altar boy, I was enthralled by the beauty of the Holy Mass and its mystery, reverence and language and music. It was all taken away by the likes of Bugnini. It is suppressed til this day by the likes of Bugnini.
For what it’s worth, time and demographics are not on the side of Francis/Marx/Tobin. The EF remains small but beautiful and growing. The OF remains ugly and almost empty. The enemy is inside the gates and has been for a long time.
Who is Bugnini? What does EF stand for? What does OF stand for? to reach people, please don’t use so much insider jargon and speak plainly for those of us who would like to learn and consider your point of view.
It is not “jargon” to know what EF and OF mean…it is simple Catholic knowledge. And it is not a mystery who Bugnini is. These are just elementary items that older Catholic people all know just by living through the last 60+ years.
Perhaps though you are younger, and have not heard of the existence of a different Eucharistic Prayer and liturgy of The Mass that existed before the 1970s. This ancient prayer, centered around The Roman Canon, the oldest existing Eucharistic Prayer in use in Christianity, has been titled “The Extraordinary Form or EF. The new Rite” fabricated in the 1970s, under the supervision of Msgr. Bugnini, was tilted “The Novus Ordo or NO (i.e., The New Order of The Mass) when it was published by Pope Paul VI.
It was the same Msgr. Bugnini who was in charge of “reforming” the prayers of The Mass who asserted in the 1970s in the Catholic journal l’Osservato Romano that Catholic liturgy should be “stripped of its Catholic theology” to be made acceptable to “our non-Catholic brethren.” The same Msgr. Bugnini who was recently revealed in the memoirs of Fr. Louis Bouyer to have deceitfully manipulated the collaborators assigned to “reform” the liturgy of The Mass, and who is described by Fr. Bouyer as “a man as bereft of basic honesty as he was of Catholic culture.”
And please don’t be so condescending…if you want people who are younger to understand and come to the knowlwdge of the truth explain yourself. Not all are so aware of the secret code of traditi onalism.
They are SSPX most likely. According to them, Bugnini and his “co-conspirators” are…something close to wicked because of their reforms of the Mass that Pope-Saint Paul VI allowed during V2.
Well, since you seem to know how to use a computer-why don’t you google the terms and find out? EF=Extraordinary Form, OF=Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite. But, then again you probably just fell into this site.
And if they did just fall into the site? What of it? Those of us who believe in God know there are no accidents. People are searching for information on their Faith and may indeed find it by “falling into ” a site. I agree with the poster that I often find the unnecessary letter abbreviations annoying. Some of us CAN read English, and in fact prefer it for purposes of clarity.
Chris, I couldn’t have said it better. I was confirmed into the “True Church” as a convert at 18. I am now 85. I was moved by the beauty of the Catholic Church and that was what drew me to Her. Also, my mother also was drawn to the Church, but she passed away before she could become Catholic, but as she died she was given a Priest who came after she passed away but still gave her Holy prayers and laying on his hands, and anointing her to bless her. He said he would do that because of her desire to be Catholic. She had already passed away when He did this but It gave me tremendous comfort. She had a catholic funeral in the Church and it was beautiful. I have become so sad over the way our Church has been Pillaried by these evil men. And also the Pope. I pray many rosaries for our Church and especially for our HOLY Priests who are driving this ship , trying to keep it from sinking. Pray many rosaries everyone, even if you don’t have time to , at least say a Hail Mary and ask her intercession. Bea
“Far more inexplicable than most of my cohort never again setting foot inside a Catholic church after hearing “Christ, Christ, Baby,” is my own decision to remain in a Church that insists on rejecting her own vibrant beauty and tradition.”
Oh, well, then, isn’t the Church blessed to have you.
This is undoubtedly a sign of what is to come at Netflix under the Obamas. I shudder to think of what the great actor Hopkins might do to Pope Benedict XVI.
Netflix destroys youth a catholic news agency someone needs to stand up for us. Parents grandparents fighting a battle which we feel we are losing latest netflix glorifying suicide. Aimed at young teens
“Truthfully, when I walk into a modern church, punished by folk music, battered by felt banners, crestfallen at the sight of a prosaic altar table buried under potted plants that might have been swiped from my dentist’s waiting room, it is hard to blame Hollywood for trivializing Catholicism. We seem to be doing a bang-up job on our own.”
************
Yup. My thoughts, too.
But weirdly, I know lovely, older Catholics who actually enjoy the dreadful folk hymns at Mass & completely ignore the ugly church décor. I guess they’ve lived with it for so long that it feels like home. They must be holier than me because I get completely distracted.
🙂
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
.
Our parish has the best liturgy around. How do I know? We are an Eastern Rite parish in the midst of the banal Novus Ordo. I think we do a great job. No David Haas or Dan Schutte or Oregon Press.
.
Alas, our new priest is somewhat frustrated with our lack-luster chanting and off key singing.
.
I mentioned this to a friend who attends a non-denominational “worship band” church. Her comment was that our priest really didn’t get what “worship” is all about. She is very proud of the services at her church and loves the various Hillsong Worship, Elevation Worship, et al.
.
I admit I initially found her church’s “worship band” music about as enjoyable as our new priest finds our chanting/singing. Having listened to the local Christian radio station for a few months now, it’s grown on me, but I’m pretty sure Bugini himself would faint.
Everyone in the world is against the Catholic Apostolic Church which Jesus speaks of to his apostles. seems most everyone is against love, peace and respect for each other. the Holy Spirit speaks to each one of us as to what to believe but we have the freedom of mind, a gift from God, that we use the human mind to think for each of us. It seems the word of Jesus is not always welcome. We seem to forget that the gift of freedom of the mind, is to be use to live the word of God in our lives. O pray that we return to the Word and live the life that God intended for us to live in love, peace and respect for one another Amen.
I won’t argue with Mr. Coleman because his analysis is probably correct. However, it’s also true that the media and Hollywood can never quite get away from it’s shallow stereotypes. In their mind, what they depict is what they actually think is true.
Excellent article that fully accords with my own history and aesthetics. Traditional liturgy and its associated paraments and accoutrements has the overwhelming appeal it and they do because they reflect, embody, and express Catholic Truth which is of course not an abstraction but Jesus Christ. The Novus Ordo with its felt banners, clay chalices, and illiterate and often heretical ditties reflect, embody, and express “Christ, Christ,Baby” which is, as one may realize, in fact the secular, profane, and, yes, even the demonic.
“Why is it that our sacred music belongs in concert halls, but not at Sunday Mass? And why should our patrimony of sacred objects be admired in museums, film, and television, but neither worn by our priests nor brought forth to adorn our altars?”
Wow, this is so very true. While I occasionally enjoy some of the modern music, as it is very “singable” and easier to participate in, I am amazed at this accurate quote which I had never thought of before. Why indeed can we not recognize our own traditional beauty.
Hollywood has the money to present a display few RC churches could ever afford. As well the vast majority of small parishes, paricularly rural ones in the “old days” did not have the sophistication to even know how to have a liturgy that inspired. Believe me, I was there. I am 75 yrs old. Cardinal Manning in speaking of the reasons against the reconversion of England; said the first one was an “uncivilized clergy.” And that was in the middle of the 19th C. Good article and very perceptive.
If you can buy de Nero as a priest, and if you can overlook the appearance of the opening credits to some major motion picture or other, you might find a short YouTube video called “Solemn Latin Mass in the Movies” illuminating. Here is the link:
I remember those Masses, and the filmmakers got this pretty much right. That said, I had to smile at De Nero’s portrayal of a priest celebrating a traditional Latin Mass; although he does everything correctly, his need to concentrate intently on his gestures and postures during the “Mass” is obvious, and makes him appear somewhat stiff and unsure of himself. This is not how real priests appear when they’ve attended and celebrated the traditional Latin Mass many times already. (Think of the difference between the way a 16-year-old backs the family car out of the driveway, versus the way Dad, a former Navy pilot, backs out of the driveway. The 16-year-old makes a solid, successful, and workmanlike job of it, but has much confidence to build; Dad handles himself and the car with the élan of a master.)
From a scriptural angle, what your article describes (the decline of the Catholic Church) is explained by St. Paul. When looking to the future of the Church, St. Paul spoke of a future “apostasy” (i.e., loss of faith, apostasia in the original Greek) and the revelation of the “lawless one” (2 Thess 2: 2-8). St. Paul even gives the reason that this would take place: “they have not accepted the love of truth so that they may be saved” (2 Thess 2: 10). This diabolical dimension explains the fury and Pharisaical self-righteousness of the secularists in their desire to eliminate anything religious. They are under the spell of the Father of Lies who hides behind expressions like “mercy killing” to eclipse the truth about the evil involved. Like Peter in the courtyard, too many of our ecclesiastics today are in effect denying Christ because of their fear of the (earthly) consequences. Nevertheless, St. Paul in the same passage also predicts the victory of goodness through the “breath” (Holy Spirit) of Jesus which in some mysterious way will reverse the situation. At Fatima, Mary basically repeats what St. Paul said with his prediction, saying that after the chaos she warned us of, “My Immaculate Heart will triumph and a time of peace will be granted to the world.” She asked especially for the prayer of the rosary and reparation for sin as our indispensable contribution to hastening the day of the triumph that does require human cooperation with heaven’s merciful designs.
I absolutely agree with you and think you did a bang-up job of this article.
I am in my mid-60s.
I have witnessed the iconoclasm and utter ugliness of “the spirit of the great deform” from the moment I saw my first ugly “folk mass,” whenever the first “performance” was “staged” (was it 1968-69, or 1970?).
Our so-called “Roman” Catholic Church, in the US (and around the world) is controlled by Bishops, priests and self-styled “trained liturgists” who obviously have CONTEMPT for Roman Catholic tradition and culture (they have the same contempt as Msgr. Bugnini, their psychological master of Iconoclasm).
The Church I was born into is the Church of 2000 years of cultural endowment. They stole that from me and my family and children, and substituted their “folk-cult” fabricated in the 1970s, by now “ex-Jesuit” priests who lived double lives, and similar non-catholic and in-Catholic “artists.”
Junk cult.
It is the Church of McCarrick and his “McCarrick Establishment:” an ugly counterfeit.
My experience has been the same. As a very young altar boy, I was enthralled by the beauty of the Holy Mass and its mystery, reverence and language and music. It was all taken away by the likes of Bugnini. It is suppressed til this day by the likes of Bugnini.
For what it’s worth, time and demographics are not on the side of Francis/Marx/Tobin. The EF remains small but beautiful and growing. The OF remains ugly and almost empty. The enemy is inside the gates and has been for a long time.
Who is Bugnini? What does EF stand for? What does OF stand for? to reach people, please don’t use so much insider jargon and speak plainly for those of us who would like to learn and consider your point of view.
It is not “jargon” to know what EF and OF mean…it is simple Catholic knowledge. And it is not a mystery who Bugnini is. These are just elementary items that older Catholic people all know just by living through the last 60+ years.
Perhaps though you are younger, and have not heard of the existence of a different Eucharistic Prayer and liturgy of The Mass that existed before the 1970s. This ancient prayer, centered around The Roman Canon, the oldest existing Eucharistic Prayer in use in Christianity, has been titled “The Extraordinary Form or EF. The new Rite” fabricated in the 1970s, under the supervision of Msgr. Bugnini, was tilted “The Novus Ordo or NO (i.e., The New Order of The Mass) when it was published by Pope Paul VI.
It was the same Msgr. Bugnini who was in charge of “reforming” the prayers of The Mass who asserted in the 1970s in the Catholic journal l’Osservato Romano that Catholic liturgy should be “stripped of its Catholic theology” to be made acceptable to “our non-Catholic brethren.” The same Msgr. Bugnini who was recently revealed in the memoirs of Fr. Louis Bouyer to have deceitfully manipulated the collaborators assigned to “reform” the liturgy of The Mass, and who is described by Fr. Bouyer as “a man as bereft of basic honesty as he was of Catholic culture.”
I hope that this puts some light on the topic.
And please don’t be so condescending…if you want people who are younger to understand and come to the knowlwdge of the truth explain yourself. Not all are so aware of the secret code of traditi onalism.
They are SSPX most likely. According to them, Bugnini and his “co-conspirators” are…something close to wicked because of their reforms of the Mass that Pope-Saint Paul VI allowed during V2.
Well, since you seem to know how to use a computer-why don’t you google the terms and find out? EF=Extraordinary Form, OF=Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite. But, then again you probably just fell into this site.
And if they did just fall into the site? What of it? Those of us who believe in God know there are no accidents. People are searching for information on their Faith and may indeed find it by “falling into ” a site. I agree with the poster that I often find the unnecessary letter abbreviations annoying. Some of us CAN read English, and in fact prefer it for purposes of clarity.
Chris, I couldn’t have said it better. I was confirmed into the “True Church” as a convert at 18. I am now 85. I was moved by the beauty of the Catholic Church and that was what drew me to Her. Also, my mother also was drawn to the Church, but she passed away before she could become Catholic, but as she died she was given a Priest who came after she passed away but still gave her Holy prayers and laying on his hands, and anointing her to bless her. He said he would do that because of her desire to be Catholic. She had already passed away when He did this but It gave me tremendous comfort. She had a catholic funeral in the Church and it was beautiful. I have become so sad over the way our Church has been Pillaried by these evil men. And also the Pope. I pray many rosaries for our Church and especially for our HOLY Priests who are driving this ship , trying to keep it from sinking. Pray many rosaries everyone, even if you don’t have time to , at least say a Hail Mary and ask her intercession. Bea
“Far more inexplicable than most of my cohort never again setting foot inside a Catholic church after hearing “Christ, Christ, Baby,” is my own decision to remain in a Church that insists on rejecting her own vibrant beauty and tradition.”
Oh, well, then, isn’t the Church blessed to have you.
Interesting and insightful article. And written by a mere layman !
This is undoubtedly a sign of what is to come at Netflix under the Obamas. I shudder to think of what the great actor Hopkins might do to Pope Benedict XVI.
Netflix destroys youth a catholic news agency someone needs to stand up for us. Parents grandparents fighting a battle which we feel we are losing latest netflix glorifying suicide. Aimed at young teens
“Truthfully, when I walk into a modern church, punished by folk music, battered by felt banners, crestfallen at the sight of a prosaic altar table buried under potted plants that might have been swiped from my dentist’s waiting room, it is hard to blame Hollywood for trivializing Catholicism. We seem to be doing a bang-up job on our own.”
************
Yup. My thoughts, too.
But weirdly, I know lovely, older Catholics who actually enjoy the dreadful folk hymns at Mass & completely ignore the ugly church décor. I guess they’ve lived with it for so long that it feels like home. They must be holier than me because I get completely distracted.
🙂
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
.
Our parish has the best liturgy around. How do I know? We are an Eastern Rite parish in the midst of the banal Novus Ordo. I think we do a great job. No David Haas or Dan Schutte or Oregon Press.
.
Alas, our new priest is somewhat frustrated with our lack-luster chanting and off key singing.
.
I mentioned this to a friend who attends a non-denominational “worship band” church. Her comment was that our priest really didn’t get what “worship” is all about. She is very proud of the services at her church and loves the various Hillsong Worship, Elevation Worship, et al.
.
I admit I initially found her church’s “worship band” music about as enjoyable as our new priest finds our chanting/singing. Having listened to the local Christian radio station for a few months now, it’s grown on me, but I’m pretty sure Bugini himself would faint.
Everyone in the world is against the Catholic Apostolic Church which Jesus speaks of to his apostles. seems most everyone is against love, peace and respect for each other. the Holy Spirit speaks to each one of us as to what to believe but we have the freedom of mind, a gift from God, that we use the human mind to think for each of us. It seems the word of Jesus is not always welcome. We seem to forget that the gift of freedom of the mind, is to be use to live the word of God in our lives. O pray that we return to the Word and live the life that God intended for us to live in love, peace and respect for one another Amen.
I won’t argue with Mr. Coleman because his analysis is probably correct. However, it’s also true that the media and Hollywood can never quite get away from it’s shallow stereotypes. In their mind, what they depict is what they actually think is true.
Excellent article that fully accords with my own history and aesthetics. Traditional liturgy and its associated paraments and accoutrements has the overwhelming appeal it and they do because they reflect, embody, and express Catholic Truth which is of course not an abstraction but Jesus Christ. The Novus Ordo with its felt banners, clay chalices, and illiterate and often heretical ditties reflect, embody, and express “Christ, Christ,Baby” which is, as one may realize, in fact the secular, profane, and, yes, even the demonic.
“Why is it that our sacred music belongs in concert halls, but not at Sunday Mass? And why should our patrimony of sacred objects be admired in museums, film, and television, but neither worn by our priests nor brought forth to adorn our altars?”
Wow, this is so very true. While I occasionally enjoy some of the modern music, as it is very “singable” and easier to participate in, I am amazed at this accurate quote which I had never thought of before. Why indeed can we not recognize our own traditional beauty.
Hollywood has the money to present a display few RC churches could ever afford. As well the vast majority of small parishes, paricularly rural ones in the “old days” did not have the sophistication to even know how to have a liturgy that inspired. Believe me, I was there. I am 75 yrs old. Cardinal Manning in speaking of the reasons against the reconversion of England; said the first one was an “uncivilized clergy.” And that was in the middle of the 19th C. Good article and very perceptive.
If you can buy de Nero as a priest, and if you can overlook the appearance of the opening credits to some major motion picture or other, you might find a short YouTube video called “Solemn Latin Mass in the Movies” illuminating. Here is the link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9i-TfGREOY
I remember those Masses, and the filmmakers got this pretty much right. That said, I had to smile at De Nero’s portrayal of a priest celebrating a traditional Latin Mass; although he does everything correctly, his need to concentrate intently on his gestures and postures during the “Mass” is obvious, and makes him appear somewhat stiff and unsure of himself. This is not how real priests appear when they’ve attended and celebrated the traditional Latin Mass many times already. (Think of the difference between the way a 16-year-old backs the family car out of the driveway, versus the way Dad, a former Navy pilot, backs out of the driveway. The 16-year-old makes a solid, successful, and workmanlike job of it, but has much confidence to build; Dad handles himself and the car with the élan of a master.)