CNA Staff, Jun 12, 2020 / 05:50 pm (CNA).- The Archdiocese of Detroit responded Thursday to a video produced by a website operating in the Detroit archdiocese, which it said used “racist and derogatory language” to describe the African-American Archbishop of Washington D.C.
The Church Militant website, which produces Catholic-themed articles and opinion videos, released a video June 11 entitled “AFRICAN QUEEN BUSTED LYING.”
The video consists of commentary from Church Militant founder Michael Voris about recent events concerning, in his words, the “accused homosexual, Marxist bishop” of Washington D.C., Wilton Gregory.
In the video, Voris characterized Gregory as a “liar” and repeated a claim Church Militant has made in other videos, articles, and on social media, that Gregory is an “active homosexual” and has promoted active homosexual clergy to a “gay cabal” in the dioceses he has led.
On June 11, the archdiocese released a statement in response.
“The Archdiocese of Detroit has been made aware that an organization located in southeast Michigan has published racist and derogatory language in reference to Archbishop of Washington D.C. Wilton D. Gregory. The organization in question is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Archdiocese of Detroit,” the statement said.
“Racist and derogatory speech wrongfully diminishes the God-given dignity of others. It is not in accord with the teachings of Christ,” Archbishop Allen Vigneron added to that statement.
“As our nation continues its important conversation on racism, it is my hope that the faithful will turn from this and all other acts or attitudes which deny the inherent dignity shared by all people.”
In remarks to CNA, an archdiocesan spokesperson issued a warning about the group.
The archdiocese “unequivocally condemns the offensive language used in reference to Archbishop Gregory and advises the faithful that Church Militant is not affiliated with, endorsed, or recommended by the Archdiocese of Detroit,” archdiocesan communications director Holly Fornier told CNA June 12.
Fornier declined to comment on whether Vigneron has any further recourse to ecclesiastical penalties against Church Militant in light of the June 11 video, and whether he was considering taking any further action beyond the archdiocesan statement.
Archbishop Gregory has faced questions in recent days about his denunciation of President Donald Trump’s June 2 visit to the John Paul II Shrine, which Gregory described as “baffling and reprehensible” given the current climate of political protest.
CNA reported June 8 that Gregory had, the week prior to the visit, declined an invitation to the president’s event at the shrine.
Voris characterized Gregory as a “liar” for speaking out on the day of Trump’s visit rather than on the day he declined the invitation.
He also claimed that “various priests who have been in his presence for more than three seconds” call Gregory “African Queen.”
Church Militant did not respond to CNA’s request for comment.
Christine Niles, senior producer at Church Militant, in a June 12 tweet repeated Voris’ claim that the nickname is used by clergy and seminarians— none of whom Church Militant has named— behind Gregory’s back.
“‘African’ is his race. ‘Queen’ is a common term used by homosexuals to refer to other homosexuals. Thus, ‘African Queen.’ It’s the name bandied about by clergy and seminarians about Abp. Gregory for years,” Niles wrote.
In another tweet, she claimed “famed sex abuse expert and former priest Richard Sipe said [Gregory] is indeed homosexual.”
Church Militant had on June 5 published a report claiming that Sipe had deemed Gregory an “active homosexual.” This appears to be a reference to a 2006 document from Sipe in which he presented “A Preliminary Review of Sexual Orientation of Some American Bishops,” and in which he noted that the list implied “no accusation of sexual activity on the part of anyone named.”
Separately, Niles on June 12 defended the moniker “African Queen” as a “movie reference” to the 1951 film “The African Queen.”
She dismissed myriad calls online from fellow Catholics to remove the video, many of whom urged Voris and the rest of the Church Militant staff to “go to confession.”
“We’re Catholics in good standing,” Niles tweeted June 12.
In the same tweet, Niles said the archdiocese “has a habit of lying, and accused it of falsifying an allegation of rape against a priest, adding that “we don’t really care what their opinion is about us. It’s irrelevant,” Niles said.
The priest in question is Father Eduard Perrone, who the archdiocese temporarily removed from ministry in July 2019 and brought under a canonical investigation for an allegation of groping a former altar boy. The priest denies the allegations.
Church Militant has frequently accused the archdiocese of fabricating a rape charge against Perrone. The Archdiocese of Detroit has not responded directly to those allegations. Several staff members of Church Militant, including Voris, have said or posted online that they attend the parish Perrone led.
The conflict is not the first clash the group has had with American bishops.
In 2011, the Archdiocese of Detroit said that Church Militant, which was founded as “RealCatholicTV,” should not use the word “Catholic” from its name. The group made a name change, while maintaining that the archdiocese did not have authority to require it, because the site was owned and headquartered elsewhere.
In 2015, then-Philadelphia Archbishop Charles Chaput said Church Militant “sow division wherever they tread,” while the Philadelphia archdiocese said the “sole desire” of Church Militant “is to create division, confusion, and conflict within the Church. Actions of that nature run contrary to Christian tradition. Their reports are not to be taken seriously.”
[…]
Pope Emeritus Benedict said that any legislation is useless we disarm our hearts. The bishops should focus on helping change people’s hearts instead of pushing legislation which has been proven worldwide to have failed in stopping gun violence.
“As people of faith, we continue to pray for all the victims, and for healing in all these stricken communities. But action is also needed to end these abhorrent acts.”
************
And I can guess what sort of action will be advocated…
It’s always easier to promote additional laws & restrictions than to examine what’s wrong with a culture that produces so many disturbed & disconnected men.
I have no problem with some sort of legislation aimed at reducing this type of violence. However, I find it odd that the Bishops seem to have the motivation to consistently push for certain political ends, but a wishy washy inconsistent approach towards ending abortion. Abortion, by far exceeds every other cause of death; worldwide, the numbers are unreal, approaching an estimated 56 million each year . Yet the bishops seem to waffle and in many cases actually undermine prolife efforts instead of getting serious about ending this horrible scourge. How anyone imagines that a country which protects and celebrates the “right” to kill a child will at the same time be a “safe” and “peaceful” place, is beyond me.
AH,
You have it exactly right. The widespread message is “If your baby is inconvenient, go ahead and kill it.” If people hear that over and over about the smallest and most innocent life, can you doubt that they are going to get the message that human life is unimportant and if they want to kill someone, why not?
Saint Paul teaches that, for evil men many laws are required but that for good men, only a few. Our present culture, in which thousands of man-made laws and continued lawmaking are seen as remedies for evil behavior, is morally sick, spiritually bereft and doomed to more of the same. And so it will be until mankind returns to the one path of salvation, already provided to us by our Creator with few laws and a Gentle Shepherd to keep us on the narrow path through the Valley of Death, from which we have strayed so far.