St. Peter’s Square in Vatican City. / Credit: Alexander_Peterson/Shutterstock
Rome Newsroom, Jun 5, 2023 / 12:20 pm (CNA).
Nobel laureates, Grammy-winner Andrea Bocelli, and several former heads of state will join Pope Francis in St. Peter’s Square on Saturday night for the World Meeting on Human Fraternity.
The June 10 event, called “#Not Alone,” will culminate with Pope Francis signing a document calling for a commitment to human fraternity drafted by a dozen Nobel Peace Prize winners together with representatives of former Nobel Prize-winning organizations.
Young people representing different countries will also form “a symbolic embrace” by joining hands in a ring around St. Peter’s Square, according to the Fratelli Tutti Foundation, the sponsor of the event.
Cardinal Mauro Gambetti, the archpriest of St. Peter’s Basilica, described the upcoming meeting as “a great day of celebration and unity inspired by Pope Francis’ encyclical Fratelli Tutti, transcending a vision that restricts social friendship to ethnic or blood ties.”
Speaking at a Vatican press conference promoting the event, Jesuit Father Francesco Occhetta, the head of the Fratelli Tutti Foundation, noted that participants in the event “will be given as a gift a piece of organic soil and seeds to plant and germinate as a symbol of the commitment to guard fraternity.”
Nobel laureates who have confirmed their participation in the World Meeting on Human Fraternity include Iraqi human rights advocate Nadia Murad, Congolese gynecologist Denis Mukwege, and Yemeni Arab Spring leader Tawakkol Karman.
The former presidents of Colombia, Costa Rica, Poland, and Democratic Republic of East Timor — all peace prize winners — will also participate, as well as representatives of several U.N. organizations that have been past recipients.
The World Meeting on Human Fraternity will begin with private meetings of five working groups representing Nobel laureates, the poor, environmentalists, students, and associations.
At 4 p.m. local time, Italian TV presenter Carlo Conti, the former host of Italy’s national Eurovision competition, will kick off an Italian television broadcast of the World Meeting on Human Fraternity event in St. Peter’s Square with performances by Bocelli and other Italian musical artists.
Pope Francis will join the event two hours later to listen to what emerged in the working group discussions, sign the human fraternity document, and join the symbolic embrace. Later, circus performers and street artists will take to the stage in St. Peter’s Square to perform until 10 p.m.
Town squares in Buenos Aires, Argentina; Jerusalem; Nagasaki, Japan; Brazzaville, Republic of Congo; and four other locations in the world will connect live to St. Peter’s Square for the event.
The following is a list of Nobel laureates and Nobel laureate representatives who will participate in the World Meeting on Human Fraternity, according to the Vatican:
Juan Manuel Santos, president of the Republic of Colombia from 2010 to 2018 (Colombia): Nobel Peace Prize in 2016 for his resolute commitment to ending the civil war that has affected his country for 50 years.
Oscar Arias Sánchez, president of the Republic of Costa Rica from 1986 to 1990 and from 2006 to 2010 (Costa Rica): Nobel Peace Prize winner in 1987 for his efforts in promoting peace and stability in Central America, in particular for his efforts to end conflicts in the region and promote dialogue and cooperation between countries.
Lech Wałęsa, president of the Republic of Poland from 1990 to 1995 (Poland): Nobel Peace Prize in 1983 for his nonviolent struggle for human rights and free trade unions in Poland. As leader of the Solidarność trade union, he played a key role in the rights of workers and in the promotion of democracy in his country.
José Ramos-Horta, president of the Democratic Republic of East Timor (East Timor): Nobel Peace Prize winner in 1996 for his work in favor of a just and peaceful solution to the conflict in East Timor.
Jody Williams, founder of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) and president of the Nobel Women’s Initiative (United States): Nobel Peace Prize winner in 1997 for work on banning and clearing landmines.
Shirin Ebadi, president of the Defenders for Human Rights Centre (Iran): Nobel Peace Prize in 2003 for her commitment to the defense of democracy, human rights, and especially women and children in Iran.
Muhammad Yunus, founder of Grameen Bank (Bengals): Nobel Peace Prize in 2006 for his work in promoting economic and social development through the concept of microcredit. Through the Grameen Bank, he provided affordable finance to the poor and helped improve their living conditions.
Leymah Roberta Gbowee, president of Gbowee Peace Foundation Africa (Liberia): Nobel Peace Prize winner in 2011. As a leader of the Liberian women’s movement, she played a vital role in ending the civil war and promoting reconciliation in her country.
Tawakkol Karman, leader of the Arab Spring (Yemen): Nobel Peace Prize in 2011. As a journalist and activist, he defended human rights, democracy, and freedom of expression in his country.
Denis Mukwege, gynecologist (Democratic Republic of Congo): Nobel Peace Prize winner in 2018 for providing medical care and support to women victims of sexual violence in times of war and armed conflict.
Nadia Murad Basee Taha, president and co-founder of Nadia’s Initiative (Iraq): Nobel Peace Prize winner in 2018 for her efforts to end the use of sexual violence as a weapon of war and armed conflict.
Giorgio Parisi, vice president of the Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei (Italy): Nobel Prize in Physics in 2021 for the discovery of the interaction between disorder and fluctuations in physical systems, from the atomic to the planetary scale.
Maria Angelita Ressa, president of Rappler Inc. (Philippines): Nobel Peace Prize in 2021 for efforts to safeguard freedom of expression.
International Peace Bureau (IPB): Organization Nobel Peace Prize in 1910 for liaising between the peace societies of various countries and helping them organize world meetings of the international peace movement. Represented by Philip James Jennings, president.
American Friends Service Committee (AFSC): Organization Nobel Peace Prize winner in 1947 for its pioneering work in the international peace movement and compassionate effort to alleviate human suffering, thereby promoting brotherhood among nations. Represented by Hector Manuel Cortez, deputy secretary general.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR): Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to the organization in 1954 and 1981 for its commitment to heal the wounds of war by providing aid and protection to refugees from all over the world and for the promotion of the fundamental rights of refugees. Represented by Filippo Grandi, high commissioner.
United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF): Organization Nobel Peace Prize winner in 1965 for its commitment to strengthening solidarity between nations and narrowing the gap between rich and poor states. The organization is dedicated to promoting and advocating for the rights of children, working to improve their health, education, and well-being around the world. Represented by Bo Viktor Nylund, special representative.
International Labour Organization (ILO): Nobel Peace Prize Organization in 1969 for having created international legislation that ensures certain standards for working conditions in each country. Represented by Gianni Rosas, ILO office director for Italy and San Marino.
International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW): 1985 Nobel Peace Prize-winning organization to disseminate authoritative information and create awareness of the catastrophic consequences of a nuclear war. Represented by Kati Riitta Maria Juva, co-president, and Onazi David, co-chair.
Peace Operations, United Nations Peacekeeping Forces: Nobel Peace Prize Organization in 1988. Its mission is to prevent armed clashes and create the conditions for negotiations between countries in conflict. Represented by Aroldo Lazaro Saenz.
Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs: Organization awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1995 for its efforts to diminish the role of nuclear weapons in international politics and, in the long term, for the elimination of nuclear weapons. Represented by Paolo Cotta Ramusino, general secretary.
International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL): Organization awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1997 for its work in banning and clearing landmines. Represented by Tun Channareth, ICBL world ambassador, and Denise Coghlan, RSM, member of the board of directors.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA): Organization awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2005 for its efforts to prevent the use of nuclear energy for military purposes and to ensure that nuclear energy for peaceful purposes is used as safely as possible. Represented by Jacek Andrzej Bylica, IAEA chief of staff.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Organization awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007 for its efforts to build and disseminate greater knowledge of man-made climate change and to lay the foundations for the measures necessary to counter them. Represented by Hoesung Lee, president.
Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW): Organization Nobel Peace Prize winner in 2013 for efforts to eliminate chemical weapons. Represented by Odette Melon, vice general manager.
International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN): Nobel Peace Prize-winning organization for its work to draw attention to the catastrophic humanitarian consequences of any use of nuclear weapons and its pioneering efforts to achieve a treaty-based prohibition of such weapons. Represented by Daniel Högsta, interim executive director.
Center for Civil Liberties: Nobel Peace Prize Organization in 2022. It has been promoting the right of expression and fundamental rights of citizens for many years. It worked hard to document war crimes, violence, and abuses of power. With its work, it demonstrates the importance of civil society for peace and democracy. Represented by Oleksandra Matvijchuk.
United Nations: Nobel Peace Prize Organization in 2001 for its work for a more inclusive and peaceful world. Represented by Miguel Angel Moratinos, undersecretary-general of the United Nations, who contributed to the creation and launch of the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations (UNAOC) in 2005 and since 2019 has held the position of high representative of the UNAOC.
Oley Back Road, representing Ellen Johnson Sirleaf: Nobel Peace Prize winner in 2011 for her nonviolent fight for women’s safety and their right to full participation in peacebuilding.
[…]
Very scholarly and I like this dude at CNA. But I do not depart from the current. St. Thomas I loved enough to read his entire Summa Theologica…but the dude helped get 5000 Protestants killed in the long run so I have my reservations. Those dangerous Prots now are good enough to fix our cars, mend our heart valves, lend us ladders, help us jump start our cars. If you want a safe neighborhood, move near the Amish…not to Brazil. St. Thomas…I’m giving up Gentleman Jack (Jack Daniels twice filtered) and I’m buying Teachers Scotch; I’m giving up all dessert. I only eat two meals a day all year. That’s it. You said the Deuteronomic death penalties showed us which sins were mortal but premarital sex was punished by divorceless marriage (Deut.22:29)…so there was a flaw in your theory. I’m having eggs because I can no longer trust you…mainly the 5000…not the premarital couple.
Your comment makes almost no sense at all. What are you trying to convey? And whose deaths are you blaming on St. Thomas? I must say, if you actually did read the Summa it doesn’t seem to have taught you anything about reason, or organization, or stringing together coherent thoughts.
Leslie…you’ll notice Blaise Pascal understood me perfectly…lol. Have you read any of the Summa T.; any of Splendor of the Truth; any of the heretic death counts by scholars? I think Blaise has. That is why he understood me…perfectly. Here are some incoherent fragments…pieces of the puzzle:
St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica…
“With regard to heretics two points must be observed: one, on their own side; the other, on the side of the Church. On their own side there is the sin, whereby they deserve not only to be separated from the Church by excommunication, but also to be severed from the world by death. For it is a much graver matter to corrupt the faith which quickens the soul, than to forge money, which supports temporal life. Wherefore if forgers of money and other evil-doers are forthwith condemned to death by the secular authority, much more reason is there for heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, to be not only excommunicated but even put to death.
Second Part of the Second Part/Question 11.
St. John Paul II lists “attempts to coerce the spirit” as an intrinsic evil in section 80 of Splendor of the Truth.
Scholars ascertain that Catholicism Killed 5000 heretics subsequent to Thomas time.
Here’s Christ in Lk. 9 telling the disciples not to kill the heretical Samaritans in the way that Elijah was allowed to kill the idol worshippers:
“51
* When the days for his being taken up* were fulfilled, he resolutely determined to journey to Jerusalem,
52
* and he sent messengers ahead of him. On the way they entered a Samaritan village to prepare for his reception there,
53
but they would not welcome him because the destination of his journey was Jerusalem.
54
When the disciples James and John saw this they asked, “Lord, do you want us to call down fire from heaven to consume them?”
55
Jesus turned and rebuked them,
56
and they journeyed to another village.”
The Samaritans heretically held that Mt. Gerizim was God’s choice of most special place not Jerusalem. Hence their inhospitality was based on Christ’s destination. Yet Christ is far from the very thing He as Word permitted to Elijah in the destruction of two companies of fifty men sent from the idolater king.
Your post was an incoherent, poorly punctuated, disorganized mess. “But I do not depart from the current.” Current what? “I’m having eggs because I can no longer trust you…mainly the 5000…not the premarital couple.” Seriously? You can’t trust the 5000? You can trust a premarital couple? What?
St. Thomas doesn’t mention Protestants. He discusses heretics, and given the heresies current in his time and the fact that their attacks on not only people’s salvation but also on the entire fabric of society his sternness is quite understandable.
https://www.firstthings.com/article/1995/12/aquinas-and-the-heretics
“St. John Paul II lists “attempts to coerce the spirit” as an intrinsic evil in section 80 of Splendor of the Truth.”
Actually, St. John Paul II quotes Gaudium et Spes (from Vatican II).
A disorganized mess that Blaise understood clearly. Perhaps he was a James Joyce fan.
Actually your place as a non moderator of this cite has nothing to do with correcting others on writing choices with vehemence. Why did you keep reading me past the second sentence? That’s the anomaly. I’m wondering if you kept reading me past the second sentence because you were hunting for turmoil..due to not opposing me on an idea elsewhere and regretting it. Why else would such a traditional grammarian keep reading while having no jurisdiction at this cite for the correcting of writing style.
Vatican II used the word “shameful” which is not as strong since people apply that to things children do at times…St. John Paul II changed it to intrinsic evils.
Thomas’ avoidance of Christ’s sternness in Luke 9 about a violence that He as Word helped with in respect to Elijah is not understandable in the greatest Catholic mind in that time period and forward. It means Aquinas didn’t take Luke 9 seriously enough for his office level in the Church.
The idolaters in the northern kingdom were involved in child sacrifice just like the abortion industry now is…yet few now in the Church advocate murdering the abortion people like Cuomo but they do want him excommunicated. The first millennium in general was against killing heretics. The second was not.
“Actually your place as a non moderator of this cite has nothing to do with correcting others on writing choices with vehemence.”
Actually I can point out that your message is a mess with as much vehemence as I want.
“Why did you keep reading me past the second sentence?”
In the hope that somewhere in your post I would find a coherent and intelligent thought. Sadly, I was disappointed.
” I’m wondering if you kept reading me past the second sentence because you were hunting for turmoil..due to not opposing me on an idea elsewhere and regretting it. ”
Snort. If I had wanted to oppose you on something elsewhere, I would have done so. I know I’ve seen your name on posts, but I don’t remember what those posts were; I may have replied to some, or not. If I didn’t reply to something, it would not set me to hunting for another post of yours to which to reply. Good grief, who thinks that way?
“Why else would such a traditional grammarian keep reading while having no jurisdiction at this cite for the correcting of writing style.”
Site, not cite. I don’t have to have “jurisdiction” to comment on lack of intelligibility.
St. John Paul quoted Gaudium et Spes. He did not create a list.
“Thomas’ avoidance of Christ’s sternness in Luke 9 about a violence that He as Word helped with in respect to Elijah is not understandable in the greatest Catholic mind in that time period and forward.”
Oooh, lookie, another incomprehensible sentence!
“It means Aquinas didn’t take Luke 9 seriously enough for his office level in the Church.”
Am I understanding correctly that you are setting yourself up as a judge of St. Thomas’ Aquinas’ competence for his position? So, your judgment is better than that of one of the greatest philosophers in history, who is also a great saint. I take leave to doubt that very much.
bill bannon: Oliver Cromwell killed more Catholics in a slow month then the Spanish Inquisition killed in three centuries.
Try to avoid comparison apologetics. It’s essentially irrelevant. I’m sure the Mayans and Incas were doing worse also. It does not brighten the Bride of Christ to note other sinners.
And, perhaps next, a diabetes association will ask him to give up candy for Lent and they will donate 1 million to his favorite charity.
I think I have had enough of underage children telling educated adults and the rest of the world what to do about Lent, OR global warming. My son, then in his 20’s and a former athlete,took up a vegan diet at the behest of his then girlfriend. He dropped a ton of weight which he did NOT need to lose. In relatively short order he looked like he had anorexia, or had been in a Japanese prison camp. It actually made him ill. Diet should not be determined by politics.In my opinion, it would be better not to help publicize stuff like this.