CNA Staff, Aug 21, 2025 / 12:12 pm (CNA).
A federal judge has partially blocked the state of Texas from enforcing its law ordering the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools.
In a colorful ruling replete with off-the-cuff observances on topics ranging from Greta Garbo to the speed of Earth’s orbit, District Judge Fred Biery said the Texas law — signed by Gov. Greg Abbott earlier this year — could pressure children into “religious observance” in violation of the U.S. Constitution.
The state government did not establish a “compelling interest” in imposing such a burden on students, Biery said, and further it failed to make the law “narrowly tailored” enough to pass constitutional muster.
“There are ways in which students could be taught any relevant history of the Ten Commandments without the state selecting an official version of Scripture, approving it in state law, and then displaying it in every classroom on a permanent basis,” he wrote.
The judge suggested that the state Legislature could alternately require schools to display moral lessons not directly connected to religious practice, such as quotes from Unitarian minister Robert Fulghum’s book “All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten.”
The ruling applies to nearly a dozen school districts, including the independent school districts of Houston and Fort Bend. The suit had been brought by a coalition of parents on behalf of their children.
State Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement to media that his office will “absolutely be appealing this flawed decision.”
“The Ten Commandments are a cornerstone of our moral and legal heritage, and their presence in classrooms serves as a reminder of the values that guide responsible citizenship,” he said.
This is not the first setback over the past year for advocates of displaying the Ten Commandments in schools.
In November 2024 a federal judge in Louisiana blocked that state’s Ten Commandments law, calling it “coercive” and “unconstitutional.”
Elsewhere, in June 2024 the state of Oklahoma directed school districts to incorporate the Bible into middle school and high school curricula, with the state superintendent citing its historical and cultural significance in helping “contextualize” the present-day United States.
One poll in June showed that a majority of U.S. adults support allowing Christian prayer in schools, though other polling showed a larger number believing the practice shouldn’t be mandatory, with more than half opposing teachers being allowed to lead classes in prayer.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Would the judge have objected to the Code of Hammurabi (composed 1755–1750 BC) being displayed?
From the Code’s Wikipedia entry (links omitted):
Modern scholars responded to the Code with admiration at its perceived fairness and respect for the rule of law, and at the complexity of Old Babylonian society. There was also much discussion of its influence on the Mosaic Law. Scholars quickly identified lex talionis—the “eye for an eye” principle—underlying the two collections. Debate among Assyriologists has since centred around several aspects of the Code: its purpose, its underlying principles, its language, and its relation to earlier and later law collections.
Despite the uncertainty surrounding these issues, Hammurabi is regarded outside Assyriology as an important figure in the history of law and the document as a true legal code. The U.S. Capitol has a relief portrait of Hammurabi alongside those of other historic lawgivers. There are replicas of the stele in numerous institutions, including the headquarters of the United Nations in New York City, the Pergamon Museum in Berlin and the University of Chicago’s Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures.
I love your comment. But the thing is, the 10 Commandments are just letters in a list of suggestions and nobody can really fully understand them in the west side of the planet in the age we live at. So, what’s the point of displaying it for? We are not fanatics cheering for a religion or dogmatic people or nationalists. Maybe we should paraphrase it so people can understand it and fully appreciate it
Allow me to show an example:
1. Thou shall have no other Gods before me.
USA/2025 VERSION:
1. Americans should not chose any alternative to love, truth, light and unity in their dealings.
2. You shall not make for yourself any graven image.
USA/2025 VERSION:
We shall never replace the conexion to our foundations that makes us good citizens for any material gain or material remainder. Who we are is priceless and cannot be replaced by objects and symbols.
3. You shall not use the Name of the Lord in vain.
3. We should have respect for truth and not mislead or deceive using anything even God as leverage for validation or credibility. This is wrong.
4. Remember the Sabbath day and keep it Holy.
4. We must remember that this world cannot rush us to it’s terms. The USA has survived many wars, natural disasters and cultural challenges by making pauses constantly to remember who we are and where do we belong and where we are going to.
Etc…
If we were to explain the Ten Commandments, nobody could argue that it causes division due to religious bias.
After all, the whole purpose of religion is to teach us, lead us, build us up and help us to finish every day stronger until God calls us home. So, fighting over this kinda defeats the purpose of the Ten Commandments.
Mister Flynn. I adore Mesopotamia, I really enjoyed your comment, but do you really think we benefit from giving bunch of trouble-makers, like me, who needs to show up to court here and there because we can’t just play by the rules?
Absolutely not. It’s better to show the benefit of these magnificent decalogue. The Bible taught in context makes sense and taught for our context makes life much better for us if we so choose to use it.
Are you a Protestant? Protestants, Catholics, and Jews all agree on the text, but not on where one commandment ends and the next begins. You are using the Protestant form (as, undoubtedly, the State of Texas would).
The Constitution, of which this judge obviously knows little, guarantees the Freedom of religion, not freedom from religion.
We believe that God’s Moral Law as summarized in the 10 Commandments are based on Moral Absolutes which are already written on very person’s heart and mind. Just read Romans 2:15