In 2025, being a man attracted to men is no novelty. Society has largely embraced homosexuality, making personal stories about it seem mundane. Yet modern discourse complicates this acceptance. Conversations now emphasize fluidity, moving beyond the mid-century labels of “gay” or “straight.” Terms like queer, pansexual, and demisexual signal a cultural shift from fixed identity to a spectrum.
The last generation fought to cement the “born this way” narrative; today’s youth are dissolving it. Both frameworks, I’ve learned, avoid the harder truth: we are defined not by desire but by what—and whom—we love and allow ourselves to be loved by, including the Whom who told us, “I AM WHO AM.”
In a cultural moment shaped by transgender discourse and conservative gay voices, anything that falls outside these narratives risks backlash. Ironically, in my own story, homosexuality is the least controversial part.
The Unseen Thread: A Hunger Misplaced
I am a 35-year-old practicing Catholic who, at times, has failed profoundly to uphold the teachings of Jesus Christ and His Church. Since high school, I’ve grappled with same-sex attraction, engaged in homosexual acts, and faced a misdemeanor conviction for a sex crime, whose shadow still lingers.
This article is not a plea for sympathy or absolution. It is a testament to the boundless mercy of God, a mercy that unsettles as much as it uplifts, challenging our notions of justice, forgiveness, and the redemption of even the gravest sins.
For years, I fundamentally misunderstood my deepest hunger. The unseen thread weaving through my life had very little to do with sexuality; it was the ache to know I was wanted. I sought this validation in transient encounters, mistaking the heat of desire for the warmth of love. This isn’t unique to same-sex attraction. We all risk seeking from the world what only God can provide—whether through our disordered desires or even good things twisted into idols.
In my early 20s, I compartmentalized my life: faith in one room, fractured longings in another. And desire, untethered from purpose, festers. What began as curiosity hardened into compulsion. I craved not intimacy but affirmation, proof that I mattered. Each encounter deepened my emptiness, yet I returned, convinced it might finally satisfy.
A Fractured Journey
At 18, I became aware of my developing attraction to other men alongside my attraction toward women. I had an unusual advantage (in those days): a family that let me be honest, without shame or fear. So I didn’t need a dramatic “coming out”; acknowledging these desires to myself and to them was matter-of-fact and simply accepted. I also confided in a priest, but his advice—”explore it”—I took as subtle permission.
Within weeks, I found myself in a cycle of casual hookups and misguided relationships. These encounters fed a hunger for acceptance and belonging, yet clashed with my faith. I vacillated between two forces: the visceral affirmation of fleeting intimacy and my convictions of the Church’s teachings.
While the sexual experiences were new, the affirmation, love, and acceptance I felt resonated deeply with what my heart had long desired. I began to feel these encounters were a legitimate means of seeking “acceptance” and being “wanted.” At the same time, I was having real encounters with God through prayer, platonic friendships, and the sacraments. I knew in my heart and mind that Jesus was truly God and that He established a Church whose teachings were also His. In hindsight, it was a gift of grace that allowed me to see and believe this truth amid my confusion.
Grace in the Wasteland
I kept going to Mass and often went to Confession, sometimes daily. Though I felt momentary satisfaction from sexual activity, my mind had already been convinced of the Church’s truth. I tried to quit, but addiction and self-deception held me.
Amid the tension, and perhaps by grace, I somehow avoided the emotionally exhausting “shame-repentance” dynamic that many religious people in my situation fall into. I saw the disconnect between my actions and beliefs, but thankfully did not feel a self-deprecating guilt or lash out in frustration at the Church or God. There was a true lack of coherence in my life, but it was not an emotionally charged one. This relative calm may have allowed me to consider all these experiences with increasing clarity.
A pivotal insight came in a bar about a couple of years after these encounters began. Amid flashing lights and pulsing music, I locked eyes with a man. I signaled interest, but as he approached, my desire vanished. I walked out and whispered to myself, “This has nothing to do with sex … It’s about being wanted.”
I was suddenly aware that this man wasn’t a person but a mirror, reflecting my desperation to feel wanted. Something had shifted in my mind and my heart; I am convinced heaven intervened that night. This began the initial movements toward the life I now find myself living, though not without setbacks.
The longing to feel wanted is natural and extremely powerful, but without roots, it becomes an intoxicant. When we’re hungry, we eat, but our true hunger isn’t for food; it’s for life. I craved validation because I needed to believe I was worthy of love—to be wanted.
The Shadows of Longing
Evelyn Waugh’s Brideshead Revisited captures this ache: “Perhaps all our loves are merely hints and symbols, vagabond-language scrawled on gate-posts and paving-stones along the weary road that others have tramped before us … snatching a glimpse now and then of the shadow which turns the corner always a pace or two ahead of us.”
Waugh’s “shadows” name a universal truth: we often chase reflections of love rather than its Source. We must remember that even good signposts are meant to lead us toward something more, something higher.
Augustine warned that disordered love isn’t love’s absence but love’s misdirection, a lesson as true for the suburban father clinging to career success as the gay man seeking a flirtatious glance in a bar.
The Particular Weight of a Particular Cross
This is not a story about avoiding “gay” relationships for “straight” ones. It’s about recognizing that no human bond—same-sex, opposite-sex, romantic, or platonic—can bear the weight of our desire for divine love. Even good desires become prisons when we make them ultimate.
Same-sex attraction is not unique in how it may attempt to satisfy itself. All of us, in our brokenness, grasp at shadows: money, power, romance, acclaim, hoping to fill the void that only God can occupy. C.S. Lewis called it “the sweet poison of the false infinite.” But this particular burden bears a unique weight because it intersects with the Church’s vision of love as a mirror of the divine communion.
The ache for intimacy is not disordered. The Church Herself sings of eros perfected, of lovers as icons of Christ’s love for His Bride. But when eros detaches from its sacramental design, it becomes a language without grammar. Natural law, and the demands it places on human behavior as the Church teaches, is not a prison for desire but a map to its homeland: the union of body and soul, difference and complementarity, sacrifice and fruitfulness. But for me, this truth felt less like a map and more like a wall.
Here lies the paradox: the very goodness of my longing for connection, the God-given hunger to love and be loved, became a battlefield. Augustine’s words haunted me: “The enemy took my will and made of it a chain.” The world calls my struggle repression; some theologians reduce it to semantics. But the real clash ran deeper: a culture that conflates identity with desire, and a God who insists that desire, however fierce, is not destiny.
Dante, lost in the dark wood, wandered until grace led him through hell’s fires, up purgatory’s mountain, to the blinding yes of paradise. My journey felt inverted. I knew the Church’s “yes” long before I felt its freedom. For years, I straddled the divide: clinging to Her sacraments, all the while not entirely convinced of the love that they promised.
But grace tugs hardest where we are knotted tightest. “God does not love us because we are valuable,” wrote Fulton Sheen, “we are valuable because God loves us.” In my case, He loved me enough to let the dissonance crescendo—until the ache for wholeness outshouted the lie of autonomy. The same law that once felt like condemnation slowly became a signpost. Not because my attractions changed, but because my understanding of love did.
A tree flourishes when rooted in soil, not concrete; a fire warms in a hearth, not scattered to the wind. So too, human love finds its melody when aligned with its design to mirror the self-giving love of the Trinity. This truth is written into the fabric of creation: things thrive when used according to their purpose. My sexuality, untethered from this design, left me hollow—not because desire itself was wrong, but because it had lost its way.
The world often paints the Church’s teachings as a “no” to freedom. But Christ’s words to the woman at the well reveal a different story: “Everyone who drinks this water will be thirsty again, but whoever drinks the water I give them will never thirst.” He is the remedy.
For years, I unknowingly clung to love as possession, a transaction to fill my emptiness. But the saints taught me to see love as an offering. Augustine’s restless heart, Thérèse’s “Little Way,” and Ignatius’s surrender all echoed the same truth: desire is not an enemy to conquer but a compass to calibrate.
C.S. Lewis, in The Weight of Glory, wrote that our desires are “not too strong, but too weak.” We settle for mud pies when a feast awaits. My same-sex attractions themselves were not a moral failure but a misdirected hunger, a mud pie mistaken for manna. The Church’s teachings became my invitation to the banquet, where even broken desires could be transfigured.
Chastity, I learned, is not the absence of love but its purification—the fire that burns away illusion, leaving only the gold that lasts. The world substitutes sex for intimacy, desire for identity. The Church restores them, not by rules alone, but by revelation and relationship: true love.
God Wrestles the Strong
Augustine’s “You have made us for Yourself” is not a metaphor but a manifesto. The thread of longing, once a noose around my will, became a lifeline. Mercy, I learned, isn’t static. It tugs.
The sacraments are not self-help tools but divine interventions. In Confession, Christ does not wait for my repentance; He chases it. In the Eucharist, He does not reward my virtue; He overwhelms my poverty.
Francis Thompson’s The Hound of Heaven paints God as a relentless pursuer: “I fled Him, down the nights and down the days …” For years, I fled into hollow validation, yet the tug persisted, a quiet insistence that my thirst was not a flaw but a fingerprint of the divine.
This is the scandal of grace: God wrestles the strong, not the weak. Jacob limped after grappling with the angel; Paul fell blind on the Damascus road. My strength—the ability to compartmentalize, rationalize, and sustain a divided heart and life—became the very battleground where grace cornered me.
The same hunger that drove me to seek love in shadows now pulls me toward the Light.
The Paradox of Mercy
The Father’s Mercy, divine and limitless, collides with the human instinct for retribution when confronted with the harm caused by me or to me. I wrestled with questions: Who am I to forgive myself? Does forgiveness negate the other’s pain?
Such doubts trap us in self-loathing or self-righteous anger. Yet Christianity offers neither cheap grace nor hollow platitudes. It demands transformation, not through self-help slogans or moral posturing, but through the same power that rolled away the stone 2,000 years ago.
As Pope Benedict XVI observed, Christianity is not simply about a philosophy or an ethic but a Person: Jesus, the author who entered His own story. It is about Love becoming Man and Man becoming Love. We find not an overlooking of anything, nor a covering over, as Martin Luther suggested, but rather the true transformation of everything. Suffering, too, not only finds practical benefits such as humility, discipline, and other natural virtues, which exist even for the atheist, but also becomes redemptive and reparative.
Nowhere else is this fully possible except with the Bride of Christ, whose body is His own. The ones He came to save are invited to participate with Him in His salvific work. This has always been the Church’s audacious claim: Even death brings new life. Hence the Exsultet’s cry: “O happy fault, O necessary sin of Adam, which gained for us so great a Redeemer!”
The Scandal of Being Known
This is not a tidy conversion tale. I remain a work in progress. Christ and His Church meet us in the mess, transfiguring sin through mercy, where justice and love collide and failures become threads in redemption’s tapestry.
To those who deem my story scandalous: you’re right. But the greater scandal is a God who dies for His betrayers. The world peddles instant fixes; Christ offers His wounds.
The unseen thread still weaves through my days, pulling me toward truth. Its end is Christ Himself—the Love who wanted me before I knew how to want.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

We are all works in progress, too. Thank you for your honesty and may God bless you Mr. Colonna on your journey.
“For years, I unknowingly clung to love as possession, a transaction to fill my emptiness. But the saints taught me to see love as an offering. Augustine’s restless heart, Thérèse’s “Little Way,” and Ignatius’s surrender all echoed the same truth: desire is not an enemy to conquer but a compass to calibrate.“
Love is not possessive, nor is it coercive, nor does it serve to manipulate for the sake of self – gratification; Love is a Gift, given freely from one’s heart, that serves only for the Good of human flourishing, and is thus devoid of every form of lust. The desire to engage in a demeaning act of any nature, does not change the nature of the demeaning act. It is always a moral choice to choose Love and avoid every form of lust, for when it comes to authentic Love, which is always rightly ordered to the inherent personal and relational Sanctity and Dignity of the human persons existing in a relationship of Love, lust , which is physically, psychologically, emotionally, and spiritually harmful, will always serve to deny the inherent Sanctity and Dignity of human persons, and thus choosing lust over authentic Love is always immoral.
J.F., I Pray that you will soon fully understand The Peace that only Christ can bring, and embrace His Life-affirming and Life-sustaining Salvational Love, and thus affirm the Sanctity and Dignity of your personhood as well as the personhood of all your beloved. God Bless you🙏
Dear Mr. Colonna,
Your journey has been very painful. God comfort you and heal your wounds. We are all on the same journey to find Love. And there He is waiting for us in our hearts. Place yourself in the arms of Our Lady and she will take you to Him and protect you from evil.
This is one of the finest essays I’ve read in a long, long time. Possibly even comparable to ST. AUGUSTINE’s own “Confessions” where, for example, he writes of himself:
“…it is no monstrous thing partly to will a thing and partly not to will it, but it is a sickness in the mind. Although it is supported by truth, it does not wholly rise up, since it is heavily encumbered by habit. Therefore there are two wills, since one of them is not complete, and what is lacking in one of them is present in the other” (Bk 8, ch. 9:21).
Also related, this from LUIGI GIUSSANI (Communion and Liberation):
“…yes, religion is in fact that which man does in his solitude; but it is also that in which the human person discovers his essential companionship [!]. Such companionship is, then, MORE original to us [!] than our solitude…Therefore, BEFORE SOLITUDE there is companionship, a companionship that embraces my solitude. Because of this, solitude is no longer true solitude, but a cry calling back that hidden companionship [CAPS added]” (“The Religious Sense,” Ignatius Press, 1990, p. 75). The Russian novelist DOSTOEVSKI, in his “Crime and Punishment,” speaks of a “subterranean solitude” that is deeper than sin, and [!] of a still deeper fellowship.
But not much help from another novelist, the bisexual and conflicted ANDRE GIDE, of whom one biographer explains:
“[Gide] emphatically protests that he has not a word to say against marriage and reproduction (but then) suggests that it would be of benefit to an adolescent, before his desires are fixed, to have a love affair with an older man, instead of with a woman…the general principle admitted by Gide, elsewhere in his treatise, that sexual practice tends to stabilize in the direction where it has first found satisfaction[!]; to inoculate a youth with homosexual tastes seems an odd way to prepare him for matrimony” (Harold March, “Gide and the Hound of Heaven”, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1952).
SUMMARY: Not much help, the clericalist counsel that “God made you that way.” Instead, as J.F. Colonna shows (brilliant pseudonym, too?), the unrecognized and soulful need to belong–ultimately to God–is the taproot of all addictions.
Love in the end is beyond the physical. Sex is always selfish. Men sexualize everything so life in patriarchy is a distorted view when held alone without deep investigation. Glad you were able to sublimate your energy to a higher level. Keep moving within on that upward trajectory. I wish you the best. Peace, dear brother.
i have wrestled with the devil all my life. the heart and soul battles daily. through my faith and Jesus who saves i truly am winning .. thanks be to God the Trinity.
This article is truly exceptional, revealing a profound and insightful understanding of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The eternal truths it contains offer divine wisdom and guidance for navigating the many trials and tribulations that God’s children encounter during our mortal sojourn. It is a text worthy of repeated study and reflection, and I have found it so valuable that I have preserved a copy for my own collection of sacred writings.
“I also confided in a priest, but his advice—”explore it”—I took as subtle permission.”
There are a lot of good things in this article, and I appreciate the author writing it, but this one statement from the article jumps out to me the most. What also jumps out at me are the other replies here (there are 7 so far) which don’t even mention this at all – which is typical Catholic.
We have a problem in the Catholic Church in that most of the laity rely on the priests to tell them what to think and do instead of taking the initiative to learn the Faith and act on it themselves. We want to be sheep and we want the clerics to be the shepherds, but that system (which I call the “Catholic System”) hasn’t worked in decades and maybe centuries — and maybe never worked. It especially doesn’t work when the clergy fall into corruption, which so many of them have obviously fallen into.
Unless “explore it” has a meaning very different than what it appears to have at first glance, everybody here should be encouraging the author to report the wayward priest to his bishop and help him find another ministry. I wonder how many other people this cleric has pushed towards homosexuality? Should the priest not have helped J.F. Colonna find the truths which God (and the devout authors of the books he read) apparently helped him find on his own? C’mon guys, how long do we tolerate evil in the clergy before we end it?
I tell my children to carefully scrutinize what anybody (including our priest) tells them and to learn the faith well enough to recognize when they are getting bad advice. Those with children here should do the same thing.
The devout laymen also need to start taking a leadership role in the Church, too, to fix the problems that the clergy are never going to fix on their own.
If that priest meant “explore” in the way in which it sounds he will have some serious explaining to do on Judgement Day. Those in authority are held to a higher accountability.
This is profound and truly inspiring. There is a lot to learn from what you wrote. I appreciate that you made yourself so vulnerable in sharing candidly about sin but even more so about your spiritual state of mind. And the writing is just gorgeous. Hoping for more pieces from you in the future!
My sentiments entirely Aaron. A truly superb article.
What a profoundly beautiful essay. You put things so well in a world where anti-God people reject Christian teaching by saying that God is not love because “he hates gay people” as one person told me. That person who said that, doesn’t believe in God because he can’t fathom anything beyond prevailing cultural definitions of love. You have blessed many by your Holy Spirit-infused words.
Remember the old country music song “Looking for Love in all the Wrong Places”? Pope Benedict XVI in encyclical Deus caritas est, a theme is eros to agape.