Pope Leo XIV addresses the crowd at the Angelus on July 13, 2025, at the papal estate of Castel Gandolfo. / Credit: Stefano Costantino/EWTN News
Vatican City, Jul 25, 2025 / 16:23 pm (CNA).
Pope Leo XIV in a message released Friday pointed out that Catholic migrants and refugees “can become missionaries of hope today in the countries that welcome them.”
“With their spiritual enthusiasm and vitality, they can help revitalize ecclesial communities that have become rigid and weighed down, where spiritual desertification is advancing at an alarming rate,” the pope noted July 25 in his message for the 111th World Day of Migrants and Refugees, which will be celebrated Oct. 4–5, coinciding with the Jubilee of Migrants and the Jubilee of the Missions.
The pontiff focused his reflection on the link between Christian hope and migration and praised the faith with which immigrants “defy death on the various contemporary migration routes.”
“Many migrants, refugees, and displaced persons are privileged witnesses of hope. Indeed, they demonstrate this daily through their resilience and trust in God, as they face adversity while seeking a future in which they glimpse that integral human development,” the pope noted in the statement.
He emphasized that their presence “should be recognized and appreciated as a true divine blessing, an opportunity to open oneself to the grace of God, who gives new energy and hope to his Church.”
The Holy Father pointed out that “in a world darkened by war and injustice, even when all seems lost, migrants and refugees stand as messengers of hope. Their courage and tenacity bear heroic testimony to a faith that sees beyond what our eyes can see and gives them the strength to defy death on the various contemporary migration routes.”
“Migrants and refugees remind the Church of her pilgrim dimension, perpetually journeying toward her final homeland, sustained by a hope that is a theological virtue,” he added.
Thus, the pope called for hope for “a future of peace and of respect for the dignity of all” despite the “frightening scenarios” of “wars, violence, injustice, and extreme weather events.”
Arms trade and current climate crisis
“The prospect of a renewed arms race and the development of new armaments, including nuclear weapons, the lack of consideration for the harmful effects of the ongoing climate crisis, and the impact of profound economic inequalities make the challenges of the present and the future increasingly demanding,” the pontiff noted in the message.
Pope Leo warned the Catholic Church against the temptation of “sedentarization” and, therefore, of ceasing to be a “civitas peregrine,” since as St. Augustine points out in “The City of God,” the people of God are “journeying toward the heavenly homeland,” because otherwise she ceases to be “in the world” and becomes “of the world.”
“This temptation was already present in the early Christian communities, so much so that the Apostle Paul had to remind the Church of Philippi that ‘our citizenship is in heaven, and it is from there that we are expecting a savior, the Lord Jesus Christ. He will transform the body of our humiliation that it may be conformed to the body of his glory, by the power that also enables him to make all things subject to himself’ (Phil 3:20-21),” Leo XIV emphasized.
He also called for a move beyond individualism, which he defined as a “serious threat” to the “sharing of responsibilities, multilateral cooperation,” and “the pursuit of the common good.”
In this regard, he criticized the “widespread tendency to look after the interests of limited communities” and pointed out that there is “a clear analogy” between immigrants and “the experience of the people of Israel wandering in the desert, who faced every danger while trusting in the Lord’s protection.”
Finally, Pope Leo expressed his desire to entrust every migrant, and those who accompany them with generosity and compassion, “to the maternal protection of the Virgin Mary, comfort of migrants.”
This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA’s Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Pope Benedict XVI announced his intention to resign the papacy during a meeting of cardinals Feb. 11, 2013. The surprise announcement, which he made in Latin, took place in the Hall of the Consistory in the Vatican’s apostolic palace. / Vatican Media
Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Jan 2, 2023 / 06:00 am (CNA).
On Feb. 11, 2013, before a gathering of cardinals who had come to the Vatican expecting to hear the announcement of upcoming canonizations, Pope Benedict XVI dropped a bombshell.
After a few announcements about Church business at the conclusion of the meeting, the pope took out two sheets of paper and read a prepared statement in Latin.
“I have convoked you to this Consistory, not only for the three canonizations, but also to communicate to you a decision of great importance for the life of the Church. After having repeatedly examined my conscience before God, I have come to the certainty that my strengths, due to an advanced age, are no longer suited to an adequate exercise of the Petrine ministry,” the then 85-year-old pontiff told the gathering of the Catholic Church’s highest-ranking clergymen.
Because he spoke in Latin, the language used for official Vatican proclamations, reporters present did not at first realize that the pope had just stepped down.
‘Total surprise, total shock’
The assembled cardinals, on the other hand, who knew their Latin, reacted with stunned silence.
American Cardinal James Stafford later told CNA that the pope’s statement was received with “total surprise, total shock.”
“A cardinal who was sitting next to me said, ‘Did he resign?’ I said, ‘Yes, that’s what he did. He resigned.’ And we just all stood at our places.”
Cardinals react to Pope Benedict XVI’s announcement of his intention to resign the papacy Feb. 11, 2013. The surprise announcement, which Benedict made in Latin, took place in the Hall of the Consistory in the Vatican’s apostolic palace. Vatican Media
Nigeria’s Cardinal Francis Arinze, who was present that morning, said the announcement was a “surprise, like thunder that gives no notice that it’s coming,” reported The Catholic Telegraph.
In renouncing the papacy, Benedict became only the second pope in almost 600 years to voluntarily step down. In 1294, Pietro da Morrone, an elderly hermit, was crowned Pope Celestine V, but finding the demands of the job too much for him, he resigned after only five months.
In 1415, Pope Gregory XII also resigned, but under very different circumstances — he stepped down in order to end a crisis within the Church known as the Great Western Schism.
Title, white clothes, and papal coat of arms
What happened next with Benedict XVI was no less surprising to those who expected him to live as a retired cardinal.
In his last official statement as pope, before a general audience on Feb. 27, 2013, Pope Benedict assured the tens of thousands of people gathered to hear him speak as pope for the last time that even though he was stepping back from official duties, he would remain, in essence, pope.
“The ‘always’ is also a ‘forever’ — there can no longer be a return to the private sphere. My decision to resign the active exercise of the ministry does not revoke this,” Benedict said.
“I do not return to private life, to a life of travel, meetings, receptions, conferences, and so on. I am not abandoning the cross, but remaining in a new way at the side of the crucified Lord,” he told the crowd.
A day earlier, on Feb. 26, 2013, the director of the Vatican Press Office, Father Federico Lombardi, had silenced speculation over what Benedict would be called and what he would wear. He would, Lombardi said, retain the trappings of the papacy — most significantly, his title and dress.
“He will still be called His Holiness Benedict XVI,” Lombardi said. “But he will also be called Pope Emeritus or Roman Pontiff Emeritus.”
Lombardi said Benedict would continue to wear a white cassock but without the mozzetta, the short cape that covers the shoulders. The pope’s fisherman’s ring would be replaced by a ring from his time as cardinal. The red shoes would go as well, Lombardi said, and be replaced by a pair of brown ones.
“The city of León is known for beautiful shoes, and very comfortable shoes. And when the pope was asked what he wanted to wear he said, ‘I want the shoes from León in Mexico,’” Lombardi said at the press conference.
On May 2, the cardinal who designed Benedict’s coat of arms in 2005 told CNA that he had written the pope emeritus suggesting that his coat of arms would need to be redesigned to reflect his new status. Cardinal Andrea Cordero Lanza di Montezemolo proposed making the keys of St. Peter smaller and less prominent.
“That shows that he had a historic possession but not a current jurisdiction,” said the cardinal at the time.
Benedict, however, it seems, politely declined a new coat of arms. La Stampa reported the following year that the Vatican Publishing House’s manual of ecclesiastical heraldry in the Catholic Church contained the following note:
“Expressing deep appreciation and heartfelt gratitude to the author for the interesting study sent to him, [Benedict] made it known that he prefers not to adopt an expressive heraldic emblem of the new situation created with his renouncing of the Petrine Ministry.”
By his decision to continue to dress in white like the pope, retain the title of pope, and keep the coat of arms of his papacy, Benedict revealed that in giving up the “active exercise of the ministry,” he was not forsaking the role of pope altogether.
Pope Francis and Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI pray together at the papal residence in Castel Gandolfo March 23, 2013, their first meeting after Francis’ election. Vatican Media
An expanded Petrine ministry
In his 2013 announcement, Benedict clearly expressed his intention to step aside, even determining the date and time of his official departure. Nonetheless, his decision to keep the title of pope and maintain the ceremonial protocol that goes along with the papacy led some to speculate whether there were not actually “two popes.”
Benedict’s personal secretary and closest confidante, Archbishop Georg Gänswein, sought to clear up any confusion in 2016.
In a speech at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome on May 20, 2016, Gänswein said that Pope Francis and Benedict are not two popes “in competition” with one another but represent one “expanded” Petrine office with “an active member” and a “contemplative.”
Parsing Benedict’s speech, Gänswein explained that in stepping down, Benedict was not giving up his ministry.
“The key word in that statement is ‘munus petrinum,’ translated — as happens most of the time — with ‘Petrine ministry.’ And yet, ‘munus,’ in Latin, has a multiplicity of meanings: It can mean service, duty, guide, or gift, even prodigy. Before and after his resignation, Benedict understood and understands his task as participation in such a ‘Petrine ministry [munus],’” Gänswein said.
“He left the papal throne and yet, with the step he took on Feb. 11, 2013, he has not abandoned this ministry,” Gänswein explained, saying the latter scenario was something “quite impossible after his irrevocable acceptance of the office in April 2005.”
Benedict himself later made clear in an interview with his biographer Peter Seewald that he saw himself as continuing in his ministry. He said that a pope who steps down is like a father whose role changes, but always remains a father.
“Of course a father does not stop being father, but he is relieved of concrete responsibility. He remains a father in a deep, inward sense, in a particular relationship which has responsibility, but not with day-to-day tasks as such. It was also this way for bishops,” Benedict said.
“I think it is also clear that the pope is no superman and his mere existence is not sufficient to conduct his role, rather he likewise exercises a function.
“If he steps down, he remains in an inner sense within the responsibility he took on, but not in the function. In this respect one comes to understand that the office of the pope has lost none of its greatness, even if the humanity of the office is perhaps becoming more clearly evident,” Benedict said.
Benedict’s decision “not to abandon his ministry” inspired a cottage industry of conspiracy theories, with some questioning whether the pope emeritus truly stepped down because of his age and frailty.
George Weigel, author of the definitive biography of St. John Paul II, “Witness to Hope,” dismissed such speculation in an interview with CNA.
“I have no reason to think that there was anything more to Pope Benedict’s resignation than what he said was its cause: his conviction that he no longer had the strength, physical and intellectual, to give the Church what it needed from a pope,” he said.
“Everything else written about this is sheer speculation. Let’s take Benedict at his word,” Weigel said.
A life of prayer
In retiring to live in the Mater Ecclesiae Monastery in the Vatican Gardens, Benedict did not completely withdraw from the world. He attended public events in his new capacity as pope emeritus, received visitors, and pursued a life of fruitful study, writing, and prayer.
Pope Francis visits Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI at the Mater Ecclesiae monastery in Vatican City to exchange Christmas greetings Dec. 23, 2013. Vatican Media
Matthew Bunson, Catholic historian, author, and executive editor of EWTN News, told CNA that Benedict was determined not to exercise authority in his new role.
“He really embraced what it means to be pope emeritus, and refrained from making public comments, to instead live a life of prayer and reflection,” Bunson said.
“Benedict really was on retreat, and in prayer,” he said, “and that means we have his prayer for us as a Church.”
While becoming increasingly frail, Benedict continued to celebrate Mass daily with the other residents of the monastery and was known to enjoy spending time in the Vatican Gardens praying his daily rosary.
In the fall of 2021, more than eight years after Benedict stepped down, his private secretary, Gänswein, told Domradio in Cologne, Germany, that Benedict was “stable in his frailty.”
He described the pope emeritus as very weak physically but still clear in mind. Gänswein said he had not lost his “typical Bavarian humor.”
The meaning of Benedict’s renunciation for future popes
In 2013, after Benedict announced that he would step down as pope, Father Gianfranco Ghirlanda, a Jesuit theologian and canonist chosen by Pope Francis to be a cardinal, wrote an essay on what should happen when a pope steps down.
In the article, published in Civiltà Cattolica, Ghirlanda suggested the retiring Benedict take the title bishop emeritus of Rome.
“It is evident that the pope who has resigned is no longer pope; therefore he no longer has any power in the Church and cannot interfere in any government affair. One may wonder what title Benedict XVI will retain. We think that he should be given the title of bishop emeritus of Rome, like any other diocesan bishop who ceases,” he said.
In December 2021, at a congress on papal resignations, Ghirlanda took up the theme again.
“Having two people with the title of ‘pope,’ even if one added ’emeritus,’ it cannot be said that this might not generate confusion in public opinion,” he said.
To make clear that the pope who resigns is no longer pope, he said, he should perhaps be called “former Roman pontiff” or “former supreme pontiff.”
Pope Francis in July 2022 told reporters that if he were to retire from the papacy he would do things differently from his predecessor.
“The first experience went very well,” Pope Francis said, because Benedict XVI “is a holy and discreet man.”
In the future, however, “it would be better to define things or explain them better,” the pontiff added.
“I am the bishop of Rome. In that case I would be the bishop emeritus of Rome,” he said, and then suggested he would live in St. John Lateran Palace rather than at the Vatican.
Rome, Italy, Apr 13, 2020 / 05:00 am (CNA).- In his Easter message, the president of Caritas Internationalis called on governments to ensure access to healthcare and social protections for all amid the coronavirus pandemic.
Vatican City, Nov 16, 2019 / 07:00 am (CNA).- Pope Francis said Saturday that more women are needed in positions of leadership in the Vatican.
“We must move forward to include women in advisory positions, also in government, without fear,”… […]
21 Comments
Sorry, this rubbish bears no relation to the hard facts on the ground of the immigration crisis that besets the world. The vast throngs of Third World immigrants breaking into the West would not recognize themselves as described in the poetic words of Leo’s ridiculous statement. Almost all would openly laugh at this flowery nonsense.
A great part of the West consists of the “Third World. ”
I imagine many of our immigrant ancestors were similar but immigration needs to be legal to be safe.
All the Palestinians who must be expelled from Gaza and the West Bank because Israel wants the land should be sent to a certain corner of Louisiana, but only on the condition that they have to stay there.
Honestly, if we could move the Muslim and Christian Arabs as far away as possible from the influence and coercion of Hamas it could be a very good thing.
Or just put Israel back in charge of Gaza .
This is such a moderate and humane proposal (maybe a Modest one!) that I am surprised that it hasn’t been thought of by anyone but you and Likud. Once the Palestinians have been dispersed to the far corners of the earth (really you want North American, Europe and Australia to take them in) they’ll forget all their resentments and recognize Israel as rightful ruler of the Holy Land, and, in fact the whole world. It’s what God wants. It will solve all our problems.
We have both Muslim and Christian Arab people in our area today Mr Tony and they seem to be doing quite well and acclimated. Like many other immigrants they’ve started up succesful businesses and restaurants.
It’s a win-win equation for all parties. Migrants and refugees are ambassadors of the Good News. They arrive with energies, skills, goodwill, patience, and a burning desire to collaborate with their distinguished hosts in the task of world rebuilding.
They sure have Mr Connor. My goodness we have amazing Vietnamese Catholics locally that have not only shared their faith but their culture. God bless them.
And many are huge Trump fans also.
The Pope says: “Catholic migrants save countries that welcome them from ‘spiritual desertification’”
I gather that Leo will be tearing down the Vatican walls to allow entry to as many “migrants” who might want to enter. God knows the Vatican could use a remedy for its own “spiritual desertification” following the desuetude of the Francis papacy.
20 million illegal migrants into the United States during the Catholic Biden administration has only contributed to the desertification of society. How many can be admitted to any entity is in the hands of those who constitute it. Pious poetics from our new Holy Father contribute absolutely nothing to a sound resolution to this dilemma orchestrated by anarchists and Marxists in the United States and in Europe.
Pope Leo need put his thinking cap on and examine the global situation like an well informed adult Christian.
I’m all in favor of border security but the folks who have lived here and kept a clean record haven’t caused desecration. The gang members, drug dealers, and trafficking networks- yes. And we’ve cooperated with them by receiving the contraband.
It takes two sides cooperation to make a smuggling operation successful.
Yes, Mrs Hess it’s a misdemeanor to enter the US without proper documentation but we’ve encouraged and abetted that for years and years.
Those who have been an asset to their communities should at least be eligible for work permits. Our fertility rate just hit the lowest point ever: 1.6. Mexico’s fertility rate is very similar.
We’re headeded for a shortage of young people while spending huge amounts of time and money rounding up an important sector of our workforce instead of attempting to normalize their status if they qualify. The bad ones need to go ASAP and our border needs to be secured.
I just believe that instead of conservative virtue signaling or becoming immigration Karens we can choose instead to conserve an important sector of our workforce. Work visas aren’t citizenship.
And no disrespect directed to anyone here personally, especially Mrs.Hess whose comments I respect and with whom I most often agree.
I don’t think it’s the responsibility of migrants and refugees to save wealthy countries from spiritual (and demographic) desertification.
It’s not their responsibility but it can be a consequence. That’s going to vary though.
In the UK there have been a number of Polish & African Catholic immigrants who are shoring up Mass attendance. More recent Muslim immigrants are not doing that.
They’re not going to save the West and that’s the last thing on their minds. The opposite is a certainty. They will destroy the very things that attract them here in the first place.
Sorry, this rubbish bears no relation to the hard facts on the ground of the immigration crisis that besets the world. The vast throngs of Third World immigrants breaking into the West would not recognize themselves as described in the poetic words of Leo’s ridiculous statement. Almost all would openly laugh at this flowery nonsense.
A great part of the West consists of the “Third World. ”
I imagine many of our immigrant ancestors were similar but immigration needs to be legal to be safe.
All the Palestinians who must be expelled from Gaza and the West Bank because Israel wants the land should be sent to a certain corner of Louisiana, but only on the condition that they have to stay there.
Honestly, if we could move the Muslim and Christian Arabs as far away as possible from the influence and coercion of Hamas it could be a very good thing.
Or just put Israel back in charge of Gaza .
This is such a moderate and humane proposal (maybe a Modest one!) that I am surprised that it hasn’t been thought of by anyone but you and Likud. Once the Palestinians have been dispersed to the far corners of the earth (really you want North American, Europe and Australia to take them in) they’ll forget all their resentments and recognize Israel as rightful ruler of the Holy Land, and, in fact the whole world. It’s what God wants. It will solve all our problems.
We have both Muslim and Christian Arab people in our area today Mr Tony and they seem to be doing quite well and acclimated. Like many other immigrants they’ve started up succesful businesses and restaurants.
It’s a win-win equation for all parties. Migrants and refugees are ambassadors of the Good News. They arrive with energies, skills, goodwill, patience, and a burning desire to collaborate with their distinguished hosts in the task of world rebuilding.
None of these points is even remotely true. Migrants do no such things.
I beg to differ. The last great wave of migrants-the Vietnamese- have contributed greatly to our country in only one generation.
How so specifically? What empirical evidence do you have to support that assertion?
They sure have Mr Connor. My goodness we have amazing Vietnamese Catholics locally that have not only shared their faith but their culture. God bless them.
And many are huge Trump fans also.
The Pope says: “Catholic migrants save countries that welcome them from ‘spiritual desertification’”
I gather that Leo will be tearing down the Vatican walls to allow entry to as many “migrants” who might want to enter. God knows the Vatican could use a remedy for its own “spiritual desertification” following the desuetude of the Francis papacy.
20 million illegal migrants into the United States during the Catholic Biden administration has only contributed to the desertification of society. How many can be admitted to any entity is in the hands of those who constitute it. Pious poetics from our new Holy Father contribute absolutely nothing to a sound resolution to this dilemma orchestrated by anarchists and Marxists in the United States and in Europe.
Pope Leo need put his thinking cap on and examine the global situation like an well informed adult Christian.
I’m all in favor of border security but the folks who have lived here and kept a clean record haven’t caused desecration. The gang members, drug dealers, and trafficking networks- yes. And we’ve cooperated with them by receiving the contraband.
It takes two sides cooperation to make a smuggling operation successful.
If they came here illegally, or overstayed some kind of visa, they are de facto, without a clean record.
Yes, Mrs Hess it’s a misdemeanor to enter the US without proper documentation but we’ve encouraged and abetted that for years and years.
Those who have been an asset to their communities should at least be eligible for work permits. Our fertility rate just hit the lowest point ever: 1.6. Mexico’s fertility rate is very similar.
We’re headeded for a shortage of young people while spending huge amounts of time and money rounding up an important sector of our workforce instead of attempting to normalize their status if they qualify. The bad ones need to go ASAP and our border needs to be secured.
Exactly. It’s not rocket science. But mrscracker seems to want amnesty for illegals, which is unacceptable.
I just believe that instead of conservative virtue signaling or becoming immigration Karens we can choose instead to conserve an important sector of our workforce. Work visas aren’t citizenship.
And no disrespect directed to anyone here personally, especially Mrs.Hess whose comments I respect and with whom I most often agree.
I don’t think it’s the responsibility of migrants and refugees to save wealthy countries from spiritual (and demographic) desertification.
It’s not their responsibility but it can be a consequence. That’s going to vary though.
In the UK there have been a number of Polish & African Catholic immigrants who are shoring up Mass attendance. More recent Muslim immigrants are not doing that.
They’re not going to save the West and that’s the last thing on their minds. The opposite is a certainty. They will destroy the very things that attract them here in the first place.