Republican presidential nominee, former U.S. president Donald Trump speaks at Trump Force 47 campaign headquarters on Aug. 26, 2024 in Roseville, Michigan. / Credit: Emily Elconin/Getty Images
Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Aug 30, 2024 / 19:02 pm (CNA).
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump said on Friday that he will vote “no” on a broad pro-abortion amendment set to appear on the ballot in Florida this November.
Earlier in the week Trump — who lives in Florida — was asked by an NBC reporter how he planned to vote on the amendment, which would enshrine the right to an abortion in the state constitution. The state currently bans most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
Trump responded that he believed that the six-week law is “too short,” telling the reporter: “I am going to be voting that we need more than six weeks.”
After facing significant backlash from the pro-life community for appearing to signal his support for the abortion amendment, Trump told Fox News on Friday that he would be voting against the measure.
He called the amendment “unacceptable” and accused Democrats of advocating abortion through all nine months of pregnancy.
“The Democrats are radical because the nine months is just a ridiculous situation, where you can do an abortion in the ninth month,” Trump said.
“And you know some of the states like Minnesota and other states have it where you could actually execute the baby after birth and all of that stuff is unacceptable.”
“So, I’ll be voting no for that reason,” the former president said.
Titled the Amendment to Limit Government Interference with Abortion or simply Amendment 4, the measure would invalidate both Florida’s six-week and 15-week pro-life protections for the unborn, allowing abortion without restriction prior to the point of fetal viability outside the womb.
The amendment would further allow abortion through all nine months of pregnancy if determined by a health care provider to be necessary for the health of the mother.
The pro-life movement in Florida has mobilized significant efforts to defeat the amendment. Miami Archbishop Thomas Wenski told CNA last week that the Florida bishops would be collectively investing more than $1 million to raise awareness about the dangers of the amendment and to urge voters to reject it at the ballot box.
Some pro-life commentators celebrated Trump’s statement on Friday.
“To everyone who said pro-lifers should shut up about it, learn your lesson: THIS is why we raise a ruckus about the things that matter!” said conservative commentator Allie Beth Stuckey.
Lila Rose, president of the national pro-life group Live Action, a Catholic, and in recent weeks a vocal critic of some of Trump’s abortion statements, responded to the news by saying: “Thank you Donald Trump!”
“Please help the great people of Florida defeat this horrific amendment!” Rose wrote on X.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Cardinal Juan José Omella, the archbishop of Barcelona, Spain, and Spain’s Ombudsman Ángel Gabilondo. / Credit: CEE
ACI Prensa Staff, Mar 30, 2023 / 14:30 pm (CNA).
The president of the Spanish Bishops’ Conference (CEE), Cardinal Juan José Omella, has handed over to the people’s ombudsman, Ángel Gabilondo, a total of six volumes of data on cases of sexual abuse of minors.
In Spain, the role of the ombudsman is to defend the fundamental rights and public liberties of citizens by watching over the activities of local and national governments as well as the administration of justice.
Speaking to Radio Nacional de España, Omella explained that all the data on cases collected by the Spanish dioceses has been turned in.
In total, the ombudsman has received “six volumes of reflection with all the data that we have up to now.” He stressed the Spanish prelates commitment to “put in place all means to eradicate” the abuse of minors.
The cardinal also said that these situations cause “great harm, not only to the Church but [also] to society.”
A year ago, the Congress of Deputies (the lower house of the national Legislature) entrusted the ombudsman with setting up an independent commission to report on complaints of sexual abuse within the Catholic Church.
A month earlier, the Spanish Bishops’ Conference made public that it had hired the law firm Cremades & Calvo Sotelo to conduct an external audit on the matter. The work was expected to take one year. Conclusions from the audit have have not yet been released.
In Spain there are more than 200 offices dedicated to the protection of minors and the prevention of abuse run by dioceses, religious congregations, and lay movements. The CEE reported that during 2022, the diocesan offices have trained more than 150,000 people, especially children and adolescents.
Throughout 2022, the CEE has received testimony on 186 new cases of abuse that occurred since 1950. The allegations involve include 74 religious order clergy, 36 diocesan clergy, 49 non-ordained consecrated persons, and 27 laymen, all male. Of them, 90 have died, 69 are alive, and in 27 cases their situation has not been confirmed, the CEE reported.
Regarding the victims, 179 were minors at the time the abuse occurred.
According to a very detailed study by the ANAR Foundation (Aid to At-Risk Chidren and Adolescents) published in 2021, priests represent a total of 0.2% of those responsible for child abuse in Spain between 2008 and 2019. Most of these situations occurred with adolescents aged 16 and over.
This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA’s Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.
Washington D.C., May 29, 2020 / 04:00 pm (CNA).- Cardinal Peter Turkson has said that the principle of “non-violence” extends beyond opposing physical violence, and must include the protection human rights from exploitation.
Acknowledging the week’s protests and rioting in Minneapolis, the Vatican cardinal made the comments during an event to mark five years since the promulgation of the papal encyclical Laudato si’.
“There’s a lot of talk within the same church about Christian non-violence,” said Cardinal Turkson, head of the Vatican’s Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development, making reference to the social unrest in Minneapolis following the death of George Floyd.
“Christian non-violence is not only when you [do not] hold a gun or a knife to the throat of somebody. Christian non-violence is also when you do not do violence to people’s dignity, people’s rights,” he said.
When the conditions necessary for human flourishing are not met in society, then the “cry of the poor” can be heard, he said, pointing to prayers for victims of racism and injustice in the wake of the Minneapolis riots.
Cardinal Turkson made his remarks as he led an online panel discussion on Friday. The event “Laudato Si After Five Years: Hearing the Cry of the Earth and the Cry of the Poor” was co-sponsored by the Vatican and Georgetown University’s Initiative on Catholic Social Thought and Public Life.
Kim Daniels, associate director of the initiative, began Friday’s event with a prayer for George Floyd “and all those who suffer from acts of racism and injustice,” after a “tragic week” where large riots and protests had occurred in Minneapolis, New York, and other cities in the U.S. Daniels was appointed by Pope Francis to the Vatican’s Dicastery for Communication in 2016.
The protests followed the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis on Monday after a police officer was seen kneeling on his neck for several minutes while arresting him. Floyd, moaning and crying out in apparent pain, said repeatedly that he could not breathe in a video of the incident taken by bystanders.
Floyd appeared unconscious several minutes into the video, and according to the police department was later taken to a hospital where he died. Four police officers involved in Floyd’s arrest were fired from the department, and one was arrested on Friday and charged with murder and manslaughter.
Noting the prayer for Floyd and other victims of racism and injustice at the beginning of Friday’s event, Turkson said that “it’s just a cry for people to recognize that every human being requires a minimum of social conditions to enable him to live, and live successfully and happily.”
Both human beings and the environment need to be cared for, he said, and when they are not “the cry of the earth and the cry of the poor” is heard—a key message of Laudato si’.
The “cry of the poor” occurs because “what they need to constitute their thriving, prosperous environment, is denied them,” the cardinal said. “And that’s why we talk about justice.”
The human and economic toll of the new coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has also taught ecological lessons, he said.
Turkson pointed out that lockdown conditions have resulted in emissions drops, causing cleaner air in India and China, but the sudden unemployment of millions of people as a result of the economic shutdown challenges the very sustainability of the current economic system.
Cardinal Turkson said that Pope Francis’ letter was the “result of a lot of teaching” from previous popes.
Pope St. Paul VI’s encyclical Populorum progressio stressed care for nature and established ecology as “a set of conditions which constitute an environment which enables something to thrive,” Turkson said, while Pope St. John Paul II talked about human ecology and the environment of moral conditions which one needs to live well, and Pope Benedict XVI’s encyclical Caritas in Veritate taught that “society itself also has an environment that needs to be respected.”
Integral ecology, he said, is “ecology of nature, ecology of the human person, ecology of society, ecology of peace.”
Exterior of Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. / Shutterstock
Boston, Mass., Nov 23, 2022 / 14:30 pm (CNA).
In a 2017 email, a doctor at the transgender clinic at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia said she was not aware of any medical studies at the time that supported the irreversible surgeries the clinic had been performing on minors, public records show.
The statement is contained in internal emails, obtained by a private citizen through a public documents request, between Dr. Nadia Dowshen — co-director of the Gender and Sexuality Development Clinic at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia — and Dr. Rachel Levine. At the time Levine, a biological male who identifies as a transgender female, was Pennsylvania’s physician general. Today Levine serves as assistant secretary for health for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Critics of so-called “gender-affirming” surgeries and treatments for young people with gender dysphoria were outraged by the disclosure, which one leading pediatrician says suggests that these procedures amount to “a giant experiment on children” that lack a clear understanding on the part of health care professionals and their young patients of the risks and long-term consequences involved.
But in a statement to CNA, Levine said there was “nothing unusual” about the email exchange and maintained that the “medical validity” of these procedures has been “affirmed.”
In one of the emails, Levine asked Dowshen and another co-director of the Gender & Sexuality Development Clinic, Dr. Linda Hawkins, about what Levine called “gender confirmation surgery” for “young people under 18 years of age,” which Levine said could include “top surgery for trans young men and top and bottom surgery for trans young women.”
“Top” and “bottom” surgery are the common parlance among transgender supporters for major, irreversible surgical changes to make a person appear to be a different sex. These include the removal of women’s breasts and the removal and reconstruction of male sexual organs.
Rachel Levine, then a nominee for assistant secretary of Health and Human Services, testifies before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions committee in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 25, 2021. Caroline Brehman/AFP via Getty Images
“Is there any literature to support this protocol?” Levine asked in the May 4, 2017, email. “Please let me know if you have any references.”
The same day, Dowshen responded and wrote: “Hi Rachel, I’m not aware of existing literature but it is certainly happening. I think we’ve had more than 10 patients who have had chest surgery under 18 (as young as 15) and 1 bottom surgery (17).”
Dowshen said she was currently working with colleagues to “get some pre-post data for top surgeries for youth under 18” and suggested that a research assistant could do a literature search to make sure they were “not missing anything,” to which Levine agreed.
“A lot of our youth are being denied coverage for top surgery if under 18,” Dowshen said.
In a statement to CNA Wednesday, Levine downplayed the significance of the email exchange.
“As physician general of the state of Pennsylvania, I worked to remain aware of the latest science in a number of health areas. This allowed me to offer policy recommendations to the governor, to offer strong managerial oversight on behalf of the people of Pennsylvania, and to coordinate effectively with my peers,” Levine said.
“My question about the existing literature on surgeries for minors was asked in the same spirit as many of the other questions I asked in that role — that of making sure I was aware of the latest and most relevant data on an issue of public interest,” Levine said.
“There was nothing unusual about that exchange, and in the years since it occurred, the medical validity of gender affirming care has only been reaffirmed and strengthened,” Levine said. “It is important to note the standards of care for patients include psychological and medical evaluations and, if necessary, treatment and support for the young person and their family. Children who have not yet started puberty do not receive medical treatment — at that age, care focuses on counseling and being mindful of the needs of the young person, their family, and their school.”
CNA also contacted Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia for comment but did not receive a response.
‘A giant experiment on children’
Dr. Quentin Van Meter, president of the American College of Pediatricians — an organization of pediatricians that advocates for children’s health and well-being — criticized the email exchange. He told CNA that it is wrong for any doctor to be doing experimental surgeries when there are no long-term studies to support them.
Van Meter said the result of the doctors doing experimental sex-change surgeries on minors is that “the lives of what will be tens of thousands of children are ruined.”
He said that there are no long-term studies in existence to support sex-change surgeries, whether that be for minors or adults.
“This is a giant experiment on children,” he said. “Medicine cannot be practiced that way.”
Van Meter also took issue with Levine’s response to CNA.
Van Meter said Levine is wrong about transgender surgeries being “affirmed” by science, saying that “it’s actually been torn to shreds by science.”
“It’s the most embarrassing, non-scientific facade in a very scientific environment,” he said.
The original publicizer of the emails, Twitter user Megan Brock, told CNA she gained access to the emails through a Pennsylvania Right to Know Law public document request.
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) is the latest hospital to come under fire after media exposés have shown that gender transition surgeries on minors have been taking place at medical institutions across the nation.
In August, Boston Children’s Hospital took heavy criticism when news broke that it was offering gender transition treatments and surgeries for kids. The hospital has since updated its website and says that only 18-year-olds qualify for “phalloplasty or metoidioplasty and for vaginoplasty surgeries.”
The website still says that the hospital will perform “chest surgery” on 15-year-olds.
In October, Vanderbilt University Medical Hospital paused gender transition surgeries on children after an investigation into the hospital was called for by Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee. Vanderbilt’s surgeries on minors — and the lucrative nature of its transgender surgeries in general — were originally exposed by Matt Walsh, an internet host for The Daily Wire.
On Friday I wrote, “Lila Rose, a staunch Catholic is too idealistic to expect anything less than Francis X Maier or Edward Feser to be a suitable prolife choice for president. It aint gonna happen honey”.
I fancy perhaps Lila read my comment and changed her mind in favor of the lesser of two evils, consequently the Thank you Donald Trump. We have a large spectrum of readers, but it’s an unlikely perhaps. Although I like to think what I write has value. The greater evil, the Dem party of deranged diversity, freedom to mutilate oneself and others by force, and death spells a tragic nightmare for a once great nation.
Back to the subject of writing, for some, more likely many it’s an entertainment to study an issue, engage in ideas and solutions, sometimes simply remarking on the aesthetic, spiritual excellence of an essay. Some respond to offer invaluable insight and knowledge. Many Catholic and others show deep interest in the things that matter as Charles Krauthammer used to say. Our beliefs, death and life convictions, however and to what degree we hold them are the center of real concern. Reality at its most purposeful. So I don’t think it’s too grandiose to think what we write and how it’s expressed has great potential for good.
I think Lila Rose was thanking Trump for changing his position on the Florida pro-abortion amendment, presumably (?) in response to objections to his previous stance from the likes of Rose herself.
I think that Pres Trump’s beautiful Catholic wife gave him an earful!
Knowing about some of Pres. Trump’s financial contributions to certain children’s and teens’ organizations, and the fact that he has five hard-working children of his own (and grandchildren), I think it’s obvious that he is definitely an advocate for children. IF there are times when he appears to be supporting pro-abortion policies, I think it’s because he hasn’t been fully informed of what awful consequences these policies will bring about–he’s not a career politician used to dealing with policy and law–he’s a businessman who has been used to letting his lawyers deal with this kind of stuff.
I think that the Democrats think they are denigrating Pres. Trump when they refer to him as a President who approved of the ending of Roe vs. Wade (which happened in large part because of the three Supreme Justices that he appointed). Joke’s on the Democrats!
Just remember–a vote for anyone other than Pres. Trump will be a vote for Harris/Wenz, who are both fanatical supporters of abortion and other abominable politics.
As an abortion abolitionist, I cannot vote for Harris or Trump. If my position is extreme, so is abortion.
We found in Texas that nothing changed until the late 90’s when we began holding RINOs (Republicans in Name Only) responsible. Democrats were almost universally pro-abortion. Republicans were more prone to lie about being pro-life for votes. By keeping a pro-life score on all in office, we highlighted how some Republicans betrayed behind closed doors the pro-life promises they made while campaigning. We followed that scorecard up by endorsing primary opponents to run against those we labeled RINOs. This strategy led to our first incremental legislative victory in 1999:
Imagine on the national level an abortion abolitionist block of voters that takes the long view, refusing to cooperate with any elected official that betrays pro-life voters behind closed doors after they get elected. Perhaps it will never work. It will never make us popular at the Country Club! But what does the national pro-life movement have to lose after decades of failure? Precious little has ever been accomplished in Washington, even when the White House and Congress were controlled by RINOs.
As for the RINO Trump, he would have betrayed pro-life as soon as he won in 2016 if pro-leaders on the inside had not been there every step of the way to hold him accountable. All we had for leverage was Trump’s obsession with winning a second term. Trump will betray everyone as soon as he thinks he can get what he wants without them. If you don’t believe me, ask anyone on Wall St., read the new Republican platform or reflect on Jan 6.
On Friday I wrote, “Lila Rose, a staunch Catholic is too idealistic to expect anything less than Francis X Maier or Edward Feser to be a suitable prolife choice for president. It aint gonna happen honey”.
I fancy perhaps Lila read my comment and changed her mind in favor of the lesser of two evils, consequently the Thank you Donald Trump. We have a large spectrum of readers, but it’s an unlikely perhaps. Although I like to think what I write has value. The greater evil, the Dem party of deranged diversity, freedom to mutilate oneself and others by force, and death spells a tragic nightmare for a once great nation.
Back to the subject of writing, for some, more likely many it’s an entertainment to study an issue, engage in ideas and solutions, sometimes simply remarking on the aesthetic, spiritual excellence of an essay. Some respond to offer invaluable insight and knowledge. Many Catholic and others show deep interest in the things that matter as Charles Krauthammer used to say. Our beliefs, death and life convictions, however and to what degree we hold them are the center of real concern. Reality at its most purposeful. So I don’t think it’s too grandiose to think what we write and how it’s expressed has great potential for good.
I think Lila Rose was thanking Trump for changing his position on the Florida pro-abortion amendment, presumably (?) in response to objections to his previous stance from the likes of Rose herself.
I think that Pres Trump’s beautiful Catholic wife gave him an earful!
Knowing about some of Pres. Trump’s financial contributions to certain children’s and teens’ organizations, and the fact that he has five hard-working children of his own (and grandchildren), I think it’s obvious that he is definitely an advocate for children. IF there are times when he appears to be supporting pro-abortion policies, I think it’s because he hasn’t been fully informed of what awful consequences these policies will bring about–he’s not a career politician used to dealing with policy and law–he’s a businessman who has been used to letting his lawyers deal with this kind of stuff.
I think that the Democrats think they are denigrating Pres. Trump when they refer to him as a President who approved of the ending of Roe vs. Wade (which happened in large part because of the three Supreme Justices that he appointed). Joke’s on the Democrats!
Just remember–a vote for anyone other than Pres. Trump will be a vote for Harris/Wenz, who are both fanatical supporters of abortion and other abominable politics.
As an abortion abolitionist, I cannot vote for Harris or Trump. If my position is extreme, so is abortion.
We found in Texas that nothing changed until the late 90’s when we began holding RINOs (Republicans in Name Only) responsible. Democrats were almost universally pro-abortion. Republicans were more prone to lie about being pro-life for votes. By keeping a pro-life score on all in office, we highlighted how some Republicans betrayed behind closed doors the pro-life promises they made while campaigning. We followed that scorecard up by endorsing primary opponents to run against those we labeled RINOs. This strategy led to our first incremental legislative victory in 1999:
https://guides.sll.texas.gov/abortion-laws/history-of-abortion-laws
Imagine on the national level an abortion abolitionist block of voters that takes the long view, refusing to cooperate with any elected official that betrays pro-life voters behind closed doors after they get elected. Perhaps it will never work. It will never make us popular at the Country Club! But what does the national pro-life movement have to lose after decades of failure? Precious little has ever been accomplished in Washington, even when the White House and Congress were controlled by RINOs.
As for the RINO Trump, he would have betrayed pro-life as soon as he won in 2016 if pro-leaders on the inside had not been there every step of the way to hold him accountable. All we had for leverage was Trump’s obsession with winning a second term. Trump will betray everyone as soon as he thinks he can get what he wants without them. If you don’t believe me, ask anyone on Wall St., read the new Republican platform or reflect on Jan 6.