
Vatican City, Jul 11, 2018 / 01:15 pm (CNA).- A long-time priority of Pope Francis, curial reform – specifically the overhaul of Vatican finances and communications – has been hanging by a thread for the past few years, and some wonder about the pope’s ability to make any meaningful or lasting changes in the Vatican’s way of doing business.
Observers seem to be underwhelmed at the progress Francis has made on major governance issues, among them financial oversight and sexual abuse policy. Some insiders have noted a palpable sense of confusion about what the pope’s reforms are meant to be, and where exactly they are going.
Since June 2017, the man tasked with leading the Vatican’s financial reform, Australian Cardinal George Pell, has been on leave, and is now preparing to face a historic trial for accusations of sexual abuse in his homeland. Some observers have argued that even when Pell was working at full-strength, the financial oversight structures Francis put into place were so tangled by internal power grabs that pursuing meaningful progress had become a delayed goal.
The pope’s communications overhaul seemed to be in shambles after the man charged with overseeing the process, Msgr. Dario Edoardo Vigano, stepped down amid the fallout of March’s “Lettergate” fiasco.
In recent months Francis has also come under fire for inaction on the topic of clerical sexual abuse, specifically in Chile.
Accused of insulting victims and ignoring their complaints, the pope had a major turnaround on the situation in Chile after receiving fresh evidence against a leading abuser priest in the country and launching an investigation which yielded findings frightening enough to make the pope stop dead in his tracks and speed into reverse.
But one of Pope Francis’ closest aides over the past five years, newly-minted Cardinal Giovanni Angelo Becciu, who is leaving the Secretariat of State for a new position as head of the Vatican’s office for canonizations, said recently that the pope’s reform still lacks an overall vision.
In comments to the press ahead of the June 28 ceremony in which he was given his red biretta, Becciu said that while many steps had been taken, it is still “too early” to give a comprehensive judgment on the Curial reform, since it is not yet finished.
An overall unifying vision is still missing, he said, explaining that “so far we’ve had elements, but not a unified idea.” This vision, he said, will likely be provided in the new apostolic constitution drafted by the pope’s nine cardinal advisors, called “Predicate Evangelium,” or “Preach the Gospel,” which has reportedly been completed and is now awaiting approval from Pope Francis.
A gloomy-seeming outlook for curial reform is often pinned on poor personnel decision-making at the Vatican. But two recent appointments to major posts could mark a turning point for Francis, and provide a much-needed morale boost for Catholics looking for the pope to clean house in Vatican offices.
The first of these is the appointment of a close Francis ally, Archbishop Nunzio Galantino, to take the reigns at the Administration of the Patrimony of the Holy See (APSA), which oversees the Vatican’s real estate holdings and investments.
During pre-conclave meetings in 2013, APSA was a key point in discussions on curial reform, as many cardinals recognized it had been being plagued by corruption and was in serious need of greater oversight.
Until Galantino’s June 26 appointment, APSA was led by Cardinal Domenico Calcagno, who has been accused of corruption and was, at one point, under investigation for charges of embezzlement in a previous diocese.
It took Francis more than five years to take action on APSA, which has been a sore spot for many who were hoping to see the pope crack down on financial issues. In a recent interview with Reuters the pope admitted that “there is no transparency” at APSA.
“We have to move ahead on transparency, and that depends on APSA,” he said in the interview. Many Vatican watchers are hopeful that Galantino will be able to bring in the accountability and oversight the office has typically resisted.
The second important personnel change is the appointment of Italian layman Paolo Ruffini as head of the Vatican’s communications office, making him the first layperson to lead a Vatican department, also called a dicastery.
Though Ruffini’s nomination was highly celebrated among Italians, who are pleased to have one of their own moving to such an important post, the new prefect is also seen as highly competent, bringing with him professional experience in journalism dating back to 1979.
Until his appointment Ruffini worked as the director of TV2000, the network of the Italian Bishops’ Conference, and he brings with him extensive experience in television, radio, and print, making him a choice perceived as a competent, well-rounded pick for the job.
Ruffini is considered to be in line with key priorities of the current pontificate, and his appointment can be read as follow-through on Pope Francis’ commitment to eradicate a clericalist mentality in the curia and to add more laypeople to the mix.
Despite the fact that Msgr. Dario Vigano, who headed the office until the “Lettergate” scandal, is expected to stay in the dicastery in the advisory role the pope gave him, observers are hopeful that at least some of the pope’s stubbornness in decision-making is gone, and that the days of poor personnel choices will be a thing of the past.
And with several decisions made that seem to indicate reform is moving in the right – or at least a better – direction when it seemed to be on the brink of failure, a natural question comes to mind: what changed?
Some believe the turning point was the pope’s reaction to the Chilean abuse crisis. After initially defending the bishop at the center of the debate, calling accusations of cover-up on the part of the bishop “calumny” and claiming that no evidence of the prelate’s guilt had been brought forward, Francis had a major turnaround when news came out that evidence had been presented years prior which he either never got, or potentially ignored.
It was a serious blow to Francis’ credibility in the fight against sex-abuse in the Church, and to his public image. Soon after he sent his top investigator on abuse to Chile to look into the situation, and after receiving a 2,300 page report, the pope issued a letter to Chilean bishops saying he had made “serious errors” in judging the situation due to a lack of “truthful and balanced information.”
Many observers pinned the blame on 84-year-old Chilean Cardinal Javier Francisco Errazuriz, who is a member of the pope’s nine-member Council of Cardinals and who has come under heavy fire from victims for covering up abuse while archbishop of Santiago, and for trying to discredit victims’ testimonies.
In his recent interview with Reuters, Pope Francis said his council of cardinal advisors, called the “C9” and whose mandate will be up in October, would be refreshed with new members.
Though such a decision is natural after term limits end, some observers have pondered whether the Chilean crisis and the accusations against Errazuriz, the absence of Cardinal Pell and separate accusations of financial misdealing on the part of Honduran Cardinal Oscar Maradiaga, also a member of the advisory team, have, to a certain degree, awakened Francis to the need to be more selective with his inner circle.
The answers to these questions, of course, are pure speculation, but if one thing can be said about the pope’s latest round of appointments, it’s that while his track record on reform efforts has not been the best, and while there are still loose ends to tie up, he is at least aware of the problems and he seems intent on making good on his promises, even if that does not happen immediately.
And if the first five years of Pope Francis’ curial reform have largely been seen as ineffective, the appointment of Ruffini and Galantino just might give the flicker of hope needed for Catholics to decide that the jury is still out on the long-term process. However, as with any reform, really only time will tell.
[…]
I believe what is happening here reflects a complete misunderstanding of consecration; and mislaying. That is in addition to the fact that JPII already consecrated Russia.
I am very sorry to have had to to say it; and sorry that this is where we have reached.
The researcher, Robert Sungenis, found that Pope Pius XII had done the consecration. How many more consecrations do we need?
Is not repentance on our part also in that message?
After the Pius XII consecration, the Soviet Union’s expansion gradually halted, and eventually it disintegrated. Russia again allowed Christians to worship. However, it was different in the West. God was increasingly being rejected, love was being expressed merely in sexual terms, scientism began to replace biblical truths, and many turned their backs on Vatican 2. Recall Exodus. The Israelites took a longer time to find their home because of a disobedient act.
Long overdue in my opinion.
So, the Ukrainian bishops asked for this, and Pope Francis agreed to the request. For people outside Ukraine and Russia, the task is to continue praying and cease sniping. There is far too much gnosticism connected with Fatima. Secrets and such are antithetical to the Gospel.
Praying for conversion is one thing: we all need it, continually. Even the baptized. Even those who consider themselves holier than the pope.
What does it mean to consecrate a nation once? Does that quality get an automatic imparting to generations yet to come? A whole generation has been born since JP2. Twenty-plus years of Ukrainian freedom and Russian fake news. Maybe the current generation, mostly those poor fighters Russia sends, need prayer. And certainly the defenders of Ukrainian freedom.
This is a good example of the sifting of the modern Church. Catholics can say, “Good job, Holy Father,” and continue with their prayers. Others will fuss about “obedience” to the visionaries and the Blessed Virgin. Sometimes I think the latter needs to deliver a spiritual (and a religious) headslap to some people.
THe Pope should be doing this however, WHY are not ALL the Cardinals and Bishops of the World joining him in this Consecration? That is actually what Our Lady of Fatima called for, every Bishop/Cardinal and even priests and we laity should be a part of this Consecration with a Rosary to preface and after.
There is a lot of trouble in the world. It is about time we Catholics turn faithfully and trustingly to our Creator. Let us prayerfully acknowledge Him, his infinite love for us, and dedicate our lives to serving Him.
Whenever Abraham’s descendants lived righteously, life was great for them, but when they did not, they suffered terribly.
Bl.Mother’s request , for the Consecration to be with – ‘all the Bishops of the world ‘ – Bishops from Russia and other separated Churches joining in same still a dream .. yet , the good will of the Popes over the years in efforts to meet the request in the best possible manner , to bring forth blessings , possibly avoiding much evil , in our times that call forth same at flood water levels .
Daily morning offering / consecration as a prayer habit that we all are asked to do ..every such intent from the children to bring forth its blessings through
The Mother .
http://www.preghiereagesuemaria.it/DV-inglese/THE%20BLESSED%20VIRGIN%20MARY%20IN%20THE%20KINGDOM%20OF%20THE%20DIVINE%20WILL%20%20FINAL%20EDITION%202014.pdf
Good meditation , for day 19 , the Feast of Annunciation …
The Church in grieving about the vast effects of the rebellion of our self will as sins against life , its despair , addictions , suicides , violence , impurities – the call of the Holy Spirit again , heeded by the attentive heart of the Holy Father for us to say to call in unison – ‘come Holy Spirit .. come through the powerful intercession of the Immaculate Heart of Mary , Your well beloved Spouse ‘ ..
to help transform the wounds and tears ..
http://www.comingofthekingdom.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/19-Mary.pdf
Our Holy Father , in the role of Servant of the Servants of God , in helping to bring forth the reign of the Divine Will – let us hope that there would only be gratitude for same from all , that there would be future such events with ever wider participations , celebrating the brotherhood of all , in The Mother .
FIAT !
Good grief! Still putting your faith in a sinful human being and not the sinless Savior. No wonder the Catholics are so messed up……Biden and Pelosi are good examples.
God trusted this “sinful human being” so much that he chose her to bear and to rear His Son. Our redemption relied in that trust. Shame on you for trying to belittle God’s chosen human being.
Shame on you for trusting in a finite created being instead of a holy eternal God. It was God’s plan in decreeing Mary to birth my Savior and her other children God had blessed her and Joseph with. Trust in Scripture and not man’s traditions.
For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.
1 Timothy 2:5 (Notice that Mary’s name is NOT included).
“I am the Lord; that is my name! I will not give my glory to another or my praise to idols”. Isaiah 42:8
Where in my post did I say that we trust Mary more than her Creator? You make false statements and then attack them. That is the usual Protestant way.
I agree. It’s clearly stated in this article that the visionary herself Sr Lucia said it’s been satisfied. The errors of Russia happened in WWII. Things may be not as they are stated by the mainstream media’s coverage of this ugly terrible war. The civilians are the innocent victims but who is the real enemy behind this? Having said that, another consecration to our Lady will bring much good.
Sorry…In my previous comment, I meant to say I agree with Elias G.
Let peace begin with me 🙏✌️🙏