When the newly elected Pope Francis appeared at the window before the
cheering crowd in St Peter’s Square, and promptly bowed down asking the people to pray for him, most of the public at large was
charmed, but puzzled. Pope Benedict too had asked the people to pray for him
from the outset, but without the bowed head. To some spectators, howeverincluding
the members of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal and their counterparts in the Protestant
and Orthodox worldsthe gesture came as something surprisingly familiar. In the “charismatic” galaxy, prayer is
offered and asked for in this way by people of all levelsspecifically, prayer
for a renewed outpouring of the Holy Spirit.
There is a photograph available on the Internet that shows Pope Francis, while still archbishop of Buenos
Aires, on his knees with head bowed as a group of evangelical pastors and
Catholic priests and laymen pray over him. As Cardinal Jorge Mario
Bergoglio, the Pope would celebrate Mass on a monthly basis for the Charismatic
Renewal of Buenos Aires. And despite the conflicts between Catholics and
Pentecostals in Latin America, word has it that Pentecostal pastors rejoiced at
the election of the new Catholic pope.
Pope Francis’ frequent mentions of the Holy Spiritwhom he has described
as someone who “annoys us”
and “moves us, makes us walk, pushes the Church to move forward”as well as
his unprecedentedly frequent references to the devil (rather than to a generic
“evil”), indicate his affinity for the Charismatic Renewal. The election of such a back-to-basics man as Supreme
Pontiff provides us with an opportunity to look at the road traveled by the
Charismatic Renewal and to “hold on to what is good” (1 Thess 5:21).
Despite the openness of its approach, for many the
Charismatic Renewal is either undecipherable or a clear-cut deviation into
“modernism.” Having made its appearance in the Catholic world after Vatican
Council II, with spectacular aspects such as prophecies and miracle-healings, it
was obviously lumped in with the many other challenging and controversial novelties
that surfaced at the time under the banner of “renewal.” Yet the Charismatic
Renewal in its Catholic expression is generally painstaking in its strict
adherence to the Church and to Catholic doctrine, a fact which, in itself, can cause
controversy and sometimes alienates Pentecostal, Evangelical, non-denominational,
or other ecumenical counterparts.
renewal, not fundamentalist revolution
Between its charismatic phenomena on the one hand, and its adherence to
Church doctrine on the other, the Catholic Charismatic Renewal
has the potential to rile people up all round. But with four years to go before
its 50th anniversary, and in the light of the official sanctions by bishops
from Italy to Argentina to Koreanot to mention messages of encouragement from Paul VI, John Paul II, and
Benedict XVIsurely this group deserves the
benefit of the doubt and unprejudiced scrutiny. As recommended in 1998 by the
future Pope Benedict, then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, speaking about ecclesial
movements in general:
we must not allow the establishment of a blasé enlightenment that
immediately brands the zeal of those
seized by the Holy Spirit and their naïve
faith in God’s Word with the anathema of fundamentalism, allowing only a
faith for which the ifs, ands, and buts become more important than the
substance of what is believed. 
While the Catholic Charismatic Renewal may to all outer appearances seem
unruly, unconventional, and a tad fanatical, in actual fact, if a bishop
anywhere were to tell a Catholic Charismatic Renewal group to close down, close
down they would. The CCR can be considered a possible antidote to the
deviations of modernism and the infiltration of pagan spirituality and the
politics of liberation theology into the life of the Church, bringing into
obedience to the Magisterium elements that attract so many to Pentecostalism:
overt spirituality, rediscovery of Scripture, the use of charismatic gifts, and
a return to the rejoicing, full-bodied mode of primitive Christianity.
Catholic from the outset
The worldwide charismatic movement, which now includes an estimated 700
million people around the world, of which an estimated 160 million are Catholics,
has its origins in the events of January 1, 1901, when a young girl began
speaking in tongues after the prayer and invocation of the Holy Spirit by a lay
evangelist of Methodist extraction. This took place in Topeka, Kansas; from there
the movement grew and gradually spread to the established churches in the
Protestant and Orthodox traditions, and lastly to the Roman Catholic Church.
Although customs and terminology were grafted onto the Catholic Charismatic
Renewal from these Pentecostal sources, the Catholic Church had its own part to
play in the January 1, 1901 beginning. On that morning, in Rome, before young
Agnes Ozman started speaking in tongues in Topeka, Pope Leo XIII ushered in the
new century by solemnly invoking the Holy Spirit over all of Christendom.
One of the chief ends that Pope Leo had explicitly dedicated his long
pontificate to was the reunion of all Christians. Now, he was asking the Holy
Spirit to bring his work to maturity and to bear fruit, with a renewed
outpouring of his gifts not just over Catholics, but over all the disciples of Christ.
Very few in the Protestant and Orthodox worldsindeed, not even many Catholicsare aware of this historical
fact. But to believers who attach such specific meaning and tangible effects to
the invocation of the Holy Spirit, it can be no small matter.
It all started with a nun in Lucca, Italy, Elena Guerra (1835-1914), the
founder of the Oblate Sisters of the Holy Spirit, whom Pope John XXIII was to beatify
and give the title “Apostle of the Holy Spirit “in 1959.
Over a period of eight years, around the turn of the last century, Blessed
Elena Guerra wrote 13 letters to the Holy Father, Pope Leo XIII, urging him to establish
an institutional devotion to the Holy Spirit. Leo was thus prompted to call the
faithful to a novena in preparation for Pentecost 1895, in an apostolic
letter entitled Provida Matris Charitate,
in which he called particular attention to one of the fruits of the Paraclete, “the
unity and unanimity” described in Acts 4:32: “The whole group of believers were
united, heart and soul.” Two years
later, he wrote his short encyclical on the Holy Spirit, Divinum Illud Munus, (“He is the substantial, eternal, and first
Love, and there is nothing more lovable than love”), explaining the Spirit’s
unity with the Father and the Son in the Trinity and making the novena to the
Holy Spirit public and permanent.
Both documents fell on deaf ears: the bishops did not take the Pontiff’s
instruction to heart and the lowly nun observed, in her sixth letter to Pope
Leo, “It is true that right after the publication of that encyclical, which I
believe was dictated by the Holy Spirit, many bishops thanked Your Holiness…And
this was good. But wouldn’t it have been better
Elena Guerra wrote more letters and Pope Leo took two more steps. On
January 1, 1901, in
St. Peter’s Basilica, he chanted the Veni
Creator Spiritus, invoking the Holy Spirit over all Christiansagain, at Elena’s suggestion. In
a letter dated October 15, 1900 she wrote: “May the new century begin with a Veni Creator Spiritus…sung either at the
beginning of the Midnight Mass, or before the first Mass to be celebrated in
every Church on the first day of the year.”
Lastly, in 1902, the Roman Pontiff, now 92, had a copy of his 1897
encyclical sent to the bishops, with a cover letter entitled Ad fovendum in cristiano populo (“To the
purpose of promoting in the Christian people”), as a reminder of the perpetual
and obligatory nature of the Pentecost novena to the Holy Spirit, again insisting
it be prayed for the unity of all Christians.
Despite Pope Leo’s efforts, the devotion died down in the Catholic
Church, which was facing troubled times, and was carried on by the order of the
Oblate Sisters of the Holy Spirit, founded by Blessed Elena.
Italy, it must be remembered, is a country whose national independence
movement waged war on the beliefs of its people. The lies and distortion of
facts about the pope, which are still with us, were the indispensable means to pry
the people’s loyalty away from the papacy and gain their acceptance of their
new rulers, the victors from the Piedmont, in Italy’s northwest.
Blessed Elena was in her prime during these years of the 19th century, when
the Catholic Church was surrounded, slandered, and hollowed out by laws that confiscated,
by degrees, the property of all of the religious orders, one after the other.
In these years, 1,322 monasteries were closed down and 57,492 religious were deprived
of their possessions, down to their very beds. The main instigator of these
confiscations was the Prime Minister of Italy, Count Camillo Cavour, a
Freemason who proclaimed himself Catholic and explained that losing all
property meant that the Church would be free of material encumbrances and
therefore better able to tend to its spiritual mandate. In other words,
stealing from the Church was presented as something entirely in the Church’s
own best interests.
This, of course, was the situation that prompted the dogma of the
infallibility of the pope, promulgated in 1870 at the first Vatican Council,
which was interrupted by the canon fire of the Northern Italian troops as they
broke through the fortifications of the city of Rome.
Decades of deliberate ambiguity, deception, and re-written history books
have taken their toll on the reputation of the pope and the hierarchy, and on many
religious orders. Thus were Catholics, whether lay or religious, in Italy and
the world over, kept busy defending and ultimately defining their faith against
division, confusion, and infiltration.
Is it any wonder, then, that the action of the Holy Spirit, at the
Pope’s invocation and Blessed Elena’s inspiration, gave rise to an immense tide
of prayer, not in Rome but on the other side of the Atlantic and in the
heartland of Protestantism?
The Holy Spirit comes full
The Charismatic Renewal was eventually sparked in the Catholic Church in
1967, not by any intervention of the pope or clergy, but at the level of the laity
at a students’ retreat at Duquesne University, in February of that year.
Interestingly, tradition puts in an appearance here as well, as Duquesne was founded
in 1878 by the Holy Ghost Fathers, members of the Congregation of the Holy
Spirit. From there the flame went almost simultaneously to Notre Dame where, in
the words of Dorothy Ranaghan, writer and witness of the beginnings, after the initial
outpouring of the Holy Spirit:
Summer school brought in priests, nuns, and lay people
from all over the world. And so we held prayer meetings and crowds
attended and hundreds were baptized in the Holy Spirit and they took
the baptism in the Holy Spirit back to their home countries. It was a wild
and wonderful summer. There were no Life in the Spirit Seminars [they hadn’t
been written yet], we just laid hands on everyone and prayed right away
and amazing things happened. Given our youth and inexperience it is all
the more evident that it was God’s work, not ours.
How interesting that at the same time that hippies were having their “Summer
of Love” in San Francisco, and the Beatles were being sought out by Maharishi
Mahesh Yogi, to attract through them the youth of the West to Hinduism and the
New Age, the Holy Spirit was invisibly at work, treating His own young people
to a wild summer of rejoicing and charismatic renewal at Catholic Notre Dame.
The Holy Spirit came full circle when the Charismatic Renewal landed
back in the Catholic Church in Rome, in 1970, led by Americans, both lay and
The proximity to the Vatican entailed of necessity a closer scrutiny of
the more conspicuous charismatic gifts, such as praying in tongues, healing,
and prophecy, as was illustrated by the jocular admission of Cardinal Ennio
Antonelli, then archbishop of Florence, at the national meeting of the Italian
Renewal in the Holy Spirit in Rimini, 1996:
Whenever I come here to be with you I always urge you
not to concentrate on the miracle-type phenomena, but rather on prayer and the
sacraments. But I must say [here he broke into a broad smile] that when I come
here, afterwards I always do feel a whole lot better!
An army of ecclesiastical figures have been to annual assemblies of the
Charismatic Renewal at Rimini, from cardinals and bishops on down to a yearly
cadre of five to seven hundred priests and nuns, especially since the Italian Bishops’
Conference gave its seal of approval to the Statutes of the Renewal in the Holy
That the more blatant manifestations of the Holy Spirit can have aroused
suspicion is no doubt due, at least in part, to the Protestant origins of
Pentecostalism, which arrived in Rome in 1908, but also to the same wariness
that led the Pharisees to accuse Jesus himself of deriving his power from the
devil (Mt 9:34 and 12:24). The extraordinary phenomena of the Holy Spirit was also
a source of difficulty for Blessed Elena. Living at a time of alarming growth
of modernist heresies (among which many remain well known to us today, such as
pantheism), it appears she too may have been suspected of modernism, or of the so-called
“Pentecostal heresy,” as news arrived of the amazing revival in America. This may
help explain why, on September 20, 1906, at the age of 71, she was cruelly
deposed, derided, placed under strict surveillance, and forbidden to write a
single line for the last eight years of her life.
The work of doctrinal definition, which can help make important
distinctions in this particularly sensitive area, is being carried out today by
the ICCRS, the International Catholic Charismatic Renewal Services, an
association of recognized pontifical right, hosted on Vatican premises.
ICCRS keeps track of Charismatic
Renewal groups, communities, and, in recent years, a female religious order
throughout the world. It has a Doctrinal Commission, headed by Mary Healy,
professor of Sacred Scripture at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit, which
works in close touch with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.