If you’re looking for a concrete example of the New Evangelization in
the public square, the new Dignitatis Humanae Institute may well be it.
Founded two years ago by a small group of Catholic European
parliamentarians and politicians, the organization aims to be a platform
through which Christian politicians can better present coherent, moderate, and
mainstream responses to the growing opposition to Christian values in public
life.
In recent months, the institute has been establishing working groups in several
parliaments with a view to spreading worldwide. Now, with a new office in Rome
due to open officially in December, the institute is stepping up its
activities, aiming to become a main point of reference and support for all
Catholics involved in public life.
Its basic principles are set out in a “Universal Declaration of Human
Dignity”a novel and pressing list of articles that purposely resembles the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights. But unlike that 1948 declaration, this
one has an emphasis on what many would argue is the most important right of all
(yet one often ignored or dismissed): the right to life.
The declaration, drawn up by Catholic European lawmakers, consists of
three main principles: that man is made in the image and likeness of God; that
this image and likeness exist in every single human being, without exception,
from conception until natural death; and that the most effective means of
safeguarding this recognition is through the active participation of the
Christian faith in the public square.
“G.K. Chesterton famously once said when you lose any respect for human
dignity, not long after you lose respect for human rights as well,” Lord David
Alton of Liverpool, head of the UK’s parliamentary working group on human
dignity, told CWR. “Those two things
always go together, and [their] basis for us as Christians is the biblical principle
in the book of Genesis that every single person is imago Dei, made in
the image and likeness of God.”
With such an emphasis on this counter-cultural truth, Lord Alton
believes, the Dignitatis Humanae Institute is “the most important organization
promoting human dignity in the world today.” He sees it as having a crucial
role to play in promoting an understanding of human rights in the light of the
natural law. The institute is saying something “that those who talk in the
flaccid language of rights and entitlements aren’t saying,” Lord Alton explained.
“It’s talking about responsibilities, duties, obligations, the needs of the
voiceless and the powerless.”
The Dignitatis Humanae Institute’s founding chairman, Benjamin Harnwell,
explained that the organization grew out of what became known as the
Buttiglione Affair. In 2004, Italian politician Rocco Buttiglione was forced to
withdraw his nomination as the European Union’s new commissioner for
Justice, Freedom, and Security because of his Catholic views on homosexuality
and women. “He was rejected, in the words of one socialist British Member of
Parliament, not for anything he had ever said but for what, as a Catholic, he
might think,” said Harnwell. “For the first time, I appreciated the extent to
which a requirement was being placed on public figures to divest themselves of
their Christianity in order to be acceptable to a militant secular
environment.”
The institute has enlisted a number of leading names in the European pro-life
movement, including the president emeritus of the Pontifical Council for
Justice and Peace, Cardinal Renato Raffaele Martino. The cardinal is honorary
president of the institute and sees the Universal Declaration of Human Dignity
as the intellectual basis of all its work. He hopes to spend his retirement and
his energies as honorary president “concentrating on the humanitarian side of
promoting human dignity, and especially the rights of children in the
developing world.”
Also, in October this year, Harnwell appointed Lord Nicholas Windsor as
the institute’s chairman. A member of the British royal family, Windsor has
been an ardent defender of the pro-life cause since he was received into the
Catholic Church in 2001. On his appointment, he stressed the need for reasoned
debate and for including in the institute’s global perspective “every threat to
the integrity of human beings, at all stages of their being and in all
circumstances.”
Another key appointment, confirmed the same day by Cardinal Martino, was
that of Ilyas Khan as the institute’s vice chairman. A British financier,
philanthropist, and well-known convert to the Catholic Church from Islam, Khan
is also chairman of the world’s largest charity for the disabled, the UK-based
Leonard Cheshire Disability.
Buttiglione, a philosophy professor and currently vice president of
Italy’s Chamber of Deputies, is patron of the new body. “I expect very much
from the institute,” he told CWR. “We
must support each other in times of persecution. My case is well-known, but how
many are there in European institutions who must face this hostility because
they don’t comply with the rules of political correctness? No one talks about
them, and they must carry on alone.”
“Also how many pressures are brought to bear on legislative processes in
Europe, dismantling piece by piece its culturesuch issues such as marriage,
life, abortion, euthanasia? But not only that. We should also changeand the institute
will help us do thisthe perspective we have,” Buttiglione added.
The Italian lawmaker is particularly concerned that this destruction of
culture through attacks on non-negotiable values is the cause of a “period of
crisis in social systems.” Unless these attacks are resisted, he believes,
democracy itself will be destroyed. “We know from history that Greek democracy
didn’t last for long,” he said. “Why did it go down? Because of corruption. Why
was it corrupt? Because of the dominance of moral relativism. Read Plato’s Republic and you see it. He explains why
democracy dominated by relativism is corrupt… then people look to a man who
promises to return some sort of order. We are not very far from that.”
For these reasons, Buttiglione believes there must be “a new engagement”
of Christians in politics, not only to defend Christian values, but to defend
democracy, and to prevent a process that ultimately leads to tyranny. “What
kind of tyranny might that be? I don’t know,” he said. “It’s not a communist
one, that’s already over. It’s not a fascist onebut there are many kinds of
totalitarianisms that are brewing in our society.”
Lord Alton likewise sees the creation of the Dignitatis Humanae Institute,
at this moment in world history, as opportune. “The timing for creating the
Institute for Human Dignity could not be betterit’s a providential moment,” he
said. “When you look at the threats to human life from fertilization to natural
death, but also the whole spectrum of
life; when you look at the persecution for religious or political
beliefs; when you look at the undermining of human dignity in areas of
conflict; when you look at areas like the sales of arms into zones of conflict;
or you look at the promotion of drugs, both legal and illegal, trying to give
some people some kind of escapism from the world in which they livepeople are
losing their dignity.”
Lord Alton continued, “When you look at the estates where we throw
people, living in often wretched conditions and abandoned; when you think about
the million people, in Britain for instance, who don’t see a friend, relative,
or neighbor in the course of an average week; the way we treat the elderlywhen you see those things you can see a need for an Institute for Human
Dignity.”
Noting also the 600 unborn babies that are killed in Britain every day,
China’s largely unopposed one-child policy, and the numerous successful
attempts to legalize euthanasia in parts of Europe and the US, Lord Alton
emphasized the need “to try and galvanize public opinion to soften hearts [and]
open minds, and then to mobilize parliamentarians as well.”
He stressed most of these human rights violations actually come from the
“rights-based agenda,” and that the “right to life” has been grossly
misinterpreted since the drafting of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human
Rights. “It beggars belief,” he said. “Against that, we need to have a
declaration of human dignity. The Institute for Human Dignity has done well in
bringing together its own articles based on promoting human dignity, which we
should encourage legislators worldwide to support and [incorporate] into the
parlance, the common vocabulary, of legislators worldwide, as [has been done
with] the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.”
Buttiglione sees the institute’s Universal Declaration in a similar
vein, but also as a key part of the New Evangelization. “This declaration is a kind
of mature fruit of Vatican II, re-read and re-actualized through the great
pontificates of John Paul II and Benedict XVI,” he said. He firmly believes it
should be viewed as part of the New Evangelization “as a tool in the resurrection
of Christianity in our time, of the New Evangelization.” Buttiglione sees
Christianity and secularization moving in cycles, and he believes the world
might be entering a new stage in which secularization is ending, and a new era
of Christianity is beginning.
Lord Alton is similarly optimistic. “At the end of the 18th century,
Britain was a pretty secularized society,” he said. “People had abandoned the
Church, and it took the Holy Spirit to come and animate men like the
evangelicals Charles Wesley and George Whitfield, then the Tractarian Oxford
MovementPusey, Keble, and Newmanand then Newman and
[Cardinal] Manning through to the Catholic Spring. It took all of that
religious renewal in society to lead to political reconstruction and then
reform.”
But he also noted that one of the products of that religious renewal was
a young man who, when elected to parliament, wasn’t yet a Christian but who
would eventually lead the campaign to abolish slavery. His name was William
Wilberforce. “The very last letter that John Wesley wrote was to him, to
encourage him to continue in his campaign to abolish slavery,” Alton recalled.
“It took him 40 years, and he took St. Augustine’s words seriouslyto pray as if the entire outcome depends upon God, and work as if the entire
outcome depends upon you.”
“I think that’s a pretty good example for the Institute
for Human Dignity to take,” Lord Alton added. “It may not come in our time, it
may require a Wilberforce, it may take persistence, but it will be a
combination of pressure and prayer and a lot of persistence which will see this
come to a successful conclusion.”