George Weigel first (and rightly) blasts
the "ill-educated Catholics in Congress" and the Catholic Health
Association, then discusses how "liberal Catholicism" has (not
surprisingly, I must say) sold the baby and the bath water for a broken
bowl of rotten porridge:
To make a
long story short, Murray’s work on religious freedom was vindicated at
the Second Vatican Council. There, two compelling arguments came
together in a powerful synthesis: Murray’s historical work and his
exegesis of Leo XIII, which put paid to the thesis/hypothesis schema,
and European personalist philosophy, which showed the Council that,
while “error” might have no rights (whatever that meant), persons had
rights, whether their opinions were erroneous or not. That settled the
question intellectually for most of the Council fathers. The politics of
defining religious freedom as a basic human right were managed by
another interesting coalition: Bishops from the Communist world, who
wanted the Church to defend religious freedom so that they might use it
as a new weapon in their own struggles, joined with U.S. bishops, who
wanted the American constitutional arrangement vindicated, and Western
European bishops, who were tired of ancien régime politics, formed a
critical mass of support, resulting in Pope Paul VI’s promulgation of
Vatican II’s landmark Declaration on Religious Freedom on December 7,
1965.
Thus began the Catholic human-rights revolution, which
would play a major role in the collapse of European Communism and in
democratic transitions in Latin America and East Asia. At the heart of
the Catholic human-rights revolution was religious freedom, and the
Church’s embrace of religious freedom owed no small debt to liberal
Catholicism in America.
Thus “liberal Catholics” who refuse to
grasp the threats to religious freedom posed by the Obama administration
on so many fronts the HHS mandate, the EEOC’s recently rejected
attempt to strip the “ministerial exemption” from employment law, the
State Department’s dumbing-down of religious freedom to a mere “freedom
of worship” are betraying the best of their own heritage. And some are
doing it in a particularly nasty way, trying to recruit the memory of
John Courtney Murray as an ally in their attempts to cover for the Obama
administration’s turning its de facto secularist bias into de jure
policy, regulations, and mandates. More than 50 years ago, Murray warned
of the dangers deracinated secularism posed to the American democratic
experiment: a warning that seems quite prescient in the light of the
Leviathan-like politics of this administration, aided and abetted by
baptized secularists who insist that they are “liberal Catholics.” I
daresay Murray, who did not suffer fools gladly, would not be amused by
those who now try to use his work to shore up their own hollow arguments
on behalf of the establishment of secularism.
The HHS-mandate
battle is bringing to the surface of our public life many problems that
were long hidden: the real and present danger to civil society of
certain forms of Enlightenment thinking; the determination of the
promoters of the sexual revolution to use state coercion to impose their
agenda on society; the failure of the Catholic Church to educate the
faithful in its own social doctrine; the reluctance of the U.S. bishops’
conference to forcefully apply that social doctrine especially its
principle of subsidiarity during the Obamacare debate. To that list
can now be added one more sad reality, long suspected but now
unmistakably clear: the utter incoherence of 21st-century liberal
Catholicism, revealed by its failure to defend its own intellectual
patrimony: the truth of religious freedom as the first of human rights.
That liberal Catholics have done so in order to play court chaplain to
overweening and harshly secularist state power compounds that tragedy,
with deep historical irony.
Read the entire piece on National Review Online. And, speaking of religious liberty, read Dr. Jeff Mirus's essay, "Religious Liberty and Conscience Rights: A Caution" on the Catholic Culture site.