Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Oct 20, 2025 / 05:20 am (CNA).
The Trump administration’s recent decision to cease publishing an annual U.S. Department of Agriculture report on household food insecurity is being met with strong criticism by the Catholic Health Association of the United States, anti-hunger activists, and academics.
The last USDA food insecurity report, covering 2024 data, is set for release Oct. 22. On Sept. 20, the USDA, led by Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, announced the termination of future “Household Food Security Reports,” which were first published in 1995 during the administration of then-President Bill Clinton.
“These redundant, costly, politicized, and extraneous studies do nothing more than fear monger,” the USDA said in a published statement.
The USDA questioned the legitimacy of the annual reports, saying food insecurity trends have remained virtually unchanged since 1995, “regardless of an over 87 percent increase in SNAP spending between 2019–2023.”
SNAP is an acronym for “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,” which according to the USDA “provides food benefits to low-income families to enhance their grocery budget so they can afford the nutritious food essential to health and well-being.” SNAP was formerly known as the “Food Stamp Program.”
The Trump administration explained its decision for discontinuing the reports, saying, “For 30 years, this study – initially created by the Clinton administration as a means to support the increase of SNAP eligibility and benefit allotments – failed to present anything more than subjective, liberal fodder.”
Responses to terminating the report
“I don’t think collecting data about food insecurity across the country is ‘liberal fodder,’” said Lisa A. Smith, vice president of advocacy and public policy for the Catholic Health Association of the United States, which generally aligns with Church teaching but has clashed with the U.S. bishops in the past on health care issues, such as the Affordable Care Act. “When you don’t have the data, it makes it more difficult to know where the keys areas of need are.”
The end of the annual food security report “is going to impact the health of low-income communities,” Smith said. Smith’s concerns were echoed by Dr. Colleen M. Heflin, a professor of public administration and international affairs at Syracuse University and co-author of Food For Thought: Understanding Older Adult Food Insecurity, a book published last month along with Dr. Madonna Harrington Meyer, a sociology professor at Syracuse.
“Without national data from the Current Population Survey on food insecurity, it will no longer be possible to track year to year variation in food insecurity due to changing economic and policy conditions,” Heflin said. “This lack of data will make it harder for Catholic charities and other community-based organizations to effectively address food insecurity without a consistent and comprehensive understanding of how food insecurity is changing for different demographic and geographic communities.”
Like Smith, Heflin dismissed the Trump administration’s claim that the reports were little more than liberal, redundant fear-mongering.
“Food insecurity data collection has been a bipartisan issue since the Reagan administration,” since the 1980s, Heflin said. Referring to the Trump administration’s plan to end the annual report, Heflin said she found “both the decision and the justification provided quite shocking and without merit.”
Dr. James P. Ziliak, a professor of microeconomics and founding director of the Center for Poverty Research at the University of Kentucky, told CNA that eliminating the USDA household food security reports could reduce public and policy awareness of hunger needs and hinder private-sector responses, such as those by Catholic health and social service organizations.
“This report was one of the most widely watched barometers of economic well-being among low- and moderate-income households in the U.S., and provided key information for policymakers, charitable organizations, and researchers,” Ziliak said in an email.
Like Smith and Hefflin, Ziliak said he did not accept the Trump administration’s explanation for ending publication of the annual report. “This is absolutely not justified, and the timing is especially harmful to public policy as the economy slows down and major cuts are being implemented in the largest federal food assistance program,” referring to SNAP.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
The usual suspects in the Catholic Church trying to advance their woke BS. Since when is it the government’s role to issue a hunger report. Let the Catholic Church do its own assessment, collect the funds needed to address the problem and then do something about it. Most of these Catholics excel at flapping their jaws instead of working on the problem they perceive. Spare us!