Vatican City, Feb 12, 2020 / 07:56 am (CNA).- Pope Francis’ post-synodal exhortation on the Amazon is part of the Church’s ordinary magisterium — that is officially a kind of Church teaching — while the final document of the Vatican’s 2019 Amazon synod is not, Cardinal Michael Czerny, special secretary of the Amazon synod, said Feb. 12.
The distinction in the authoritative weight of the two documents was also emphasized Wednesday by Cardinal Lorenzo Baldisseri, secretary general of the Synod of Bishops, and by Matteo Bruni, the director of the Holy See Press Office.
“So we have two documents of two different kinds,” Czerny said in a presentation to journalists.
“The final document, consisting of proposals made and voted by the Synod Fathers, has the weight of a synodal final document,” he said, whereas the apostolic exhortation, “reflecting on the whole process and its final document, has the authority of ordinary magisterium of the Successor of Peter.”
Pope Francis released Feb. 12 the apostolic letter Querida Amazonia, which presents his response to the discussion of the Amazon synod, which took place in Rome over three weeks in October.
This synod ended with the presentation to Pope Francis of a final document, which was voted on by synod members setting out a series of recommendations based on the issues discussed during the preparation phase and synodal sessions.
The final document of the synod assembly is what Czerny and Baldisseri said does not have the weight of ordinary magisterium, noting the pope’s “presentation” of the document.
Pope Francis “encourages everyone to read the whole document” Czerny stated, but added that suggestions made in the synod’s final document remain in discussion only “as proposals made by the synod.” This means that Catholics are not required to believe, or even agree with, the proposals, or regard them as teachings of the pope.
In Querida Amazonia itself, Pope Francis offers his own reflections on the Amazon, saying he “will not go into all of the issues treated at length in the [synod’s] final document. Nor do I claim to replace that text or to duplicate it.”
The pope states that, at the same time, he “would like to officially present the Final Document, which sets forth the conclusions of the Synod…”
Francis added: “I have preferred not to cite the Final Document in this Exhortation, because I would encourage everyone to read it in full.”
The pope also asks that “pastors, consecrated men and women and lay faithful of the Amazon region strive to apply” the work of the synodal assembly.
Francis’ use of the words “officially present,” prompted some to ask if the pope wishes to give added weight to the synod’s conclusions, even if he chose not to cite them directly in his own document.
Bruni emphasized that “the apostolic exhortation is magisterium, the final document is not.” He later added that “anything in the final document should be read in the lens of the apostolic exhortation,” including any “application.”
The option for the pope to adopt the final synodal document as his own, including it as official Church teaching, was part of changes the pontiff made to synod rules in 2018. Since that year, canon law has permitted the pope to give a specific and deliberate kind of approval to a final synodal document that would incorporate the text into the pope’s ordinary magisterium, or official teaching.
However, Baldisseri said that article 18 of Episcopalis Communio, which established that law, makes clear that the pope needs to give his approval “expressly.”
“The apostolic exhortation does not speak of approval of the final document. It does not speak [of it]. It speaks of presentation, but not of approval,” Baldisseri continued. “There is not a clear canonical word of approval, as in article 18 of Episcopalis Communio. It speaks of express approval, not indirect, imagined.”
The final document of the Amazon synod “has a certain moral authority, sure,” he added, “but not magisterial.”
Synods of bishops convened by the pope serve a mainly consultative role, as indicated in the Code of Canon Law.
Their main purpose is to foster unity between the pope and the bishops around the world, and to offer their input as the pope considers questions pertaining to the Church’s activity in different parts of the world, on issues of faith and morals, and “in the observance and strengthening of ecclesiastical discipline.”
“It is,” the Code says, “for the synod of bishops to discuss the questions for consideration and express its wishes but not to resolve them or issue decrees about them unless in certain cases the Roman Pontiff has endowed it with deliberative power, in which case he ratifies the decisions of the synod.”
Czerny said he thinks the best way to understand the synod’s debate of the possibility of the ordination of married priests in the Amazon region is to see it “as part of a process and as part of a journey.”
“That’s why it’s called a synod,” he noted, adding that “we are at a very important part in this synodal process and there are long roads ahead as well as long roads already traveled.”
“And so the questions you are returning to are questions ‘on the road,’ and the Holy Father has not resolved them in any way beyond what he has said in the exhortation,” the cardinal underlined.
“So if there are questions you feel are open, or that the Church feels are open, thanks to the exhortation they will continue to be discussed, debated, discerned, prayed over, and when mature, presented to the appropriate authority for decision,” he said.
“There are decisions that can be made in a diocese, in a [bishops’] conference, and there are decisions that are made here [in the Vatican].”
[…]
I live in Phoenix.
Goodbye to Bishop Olmsted. Godspeed in all.
God help us with Dolan. Very familiar with his ‘outreach’ to active homosexuals and his disdain for the Catholic doctrine on morality.
This “George Soros” progressive papacy rides on.
Um, I think Mr Soros is Jewish. Not Catholic. Judaism has no pope.
How does Soros and the progressive papacy define ‘Catholic in name only’? Does Francis define the set of ‘Catholic’? Fratelli Tutti teaches that we are all brothers and sisters. Why do you draw religious distinctions if God wills them all, according to Francis?
Um, because you have to be a Catholic to be a pope.
Hint: it’s a light-hearted comment. Not to be over-thought.
Francis teaches falsely. We are not all brothers and sisters. Our brothers and sisters are our fellow Christians. Catholics used to know this, but have been progressively dumbed down in recent decades, and no longer grasp basic Christian doctrine.
I know, as do you and most other orthodox Catholics, that Francis’s teaching in Fratelli Tutti is not the way to global harmony, yet some like Flowerday and Soros support Francis’ claim. Francis and Soros both tend to sugar-coated, fruit-flavored brotherhood as what the world needs now: A great big tutti-frutti-flavored kiss, everyone to every other.
Francis and Flower use distinctions of religion when useful to distort, insult, or rationalize.
The Pope is CATHOLIC while Soros is JEWISH. Nothing in common there. Not even sugar-coated fruit. See how different they are?? Nothing to see.
Then Flowerday levels a ‘stupid-you type’ accusation against Ramjet and tells me I’ve missed a joke. Stupid Ram! Stupid me! Smart Flower!
To Flowerday: ?Over-thought? You ain’t seen the start.
You speak well on the matter. God bless you as you proclaim His majesty and truth.
The Unholy Alliance Between George Soros and Pope Francis
Ramjet’s comment flew right past you.
Soros finances the anti-Christian secular agenda, of which Francis has had many episodes of willful cooperation, or haven’t you troubled yourself to care? By the way, Soros is an atheist.
Olmsted, rock solid, was retired as soon as he resigned. The new bishop is McElroy groomed. Tradition in Phoenix will soon come under attack. Bet on it.
Yep. Bp. Olmstead here, Abp. Chaput a couple of years ago…Francis accepted their mandatory resignations before the letters had fluttered to the desktop. Outa the way, faithful bishops. There’s revolutionizing to be done!
More of the same.
May I recommend today’s article in The Catholic Thing?
From George to Cupich. Sarah to Roche. Olmsted to Dolan. Can it be any clearer? Lord, help us.
Inaxios.
Don’t miss the forest because of the trees. You know the general point that Ramjet is making. Don’t defend the indefensible.
SUNNY-SAN-DIEGO-BISHOPS:
A. Death penalty for murderers, even repeat offenders: “We have “progressed” to see now that this is “not admissible.” (Jez-Colonizers in Vatican City wrote that buzz for our “NEW-CAT.”)
Death penalty for the unborn…well yeah…Nancy said so.
Viva la revolution!
And remember, if you know what’s good for you, just pretend reality isn’t happening.
My meeting with Archbishop Olmsted when he visited my mission parish in the Gallup NM diocese as coadjutor was a happy experience. He was quite friendly, interested in the Jicarilla Apache mission, knowledgeable, steadfast in his faith. Later at a clergy convocation in Albuquerque we met again and had a welcome conversation on practice of the faith. Needless to say the Phoenix diocese is losing a very fine pastor.
I’m not at all pleased with his replacement, who seems more interested in protecting the rights of the deviant than practice of the faith. Bishop John Dolan’s appointment akin to Bishop McElroy’s elevation to the cardinalate reveals with little ambiguity the direction Pope Francis intends to take the Church. Humility and obedience are one thing, adherence to a misdirected effort is another.