No Picture
News Briefs

US bishops decry policy of expedited removal of undocumented migrants

July 25, 2019 CNA Daily News 1

Washington D.C., Jul 25, 2019 / 10:32 am (CNA).- The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops spoke out Thursday against new Department of Homeland Security policies that includes the expedited removal of undocumented migrants who cannot prove to an immigration officer they have lived in the United States for two continuous years.

“This action is yet another escalation of this Administration’s enforcement-only immigration approach, and it will have terrible human consequences,” Bishop Joe Vásquez of Austin, Texas, Chair of the of the US bishops’ migration committee, said in a July 25 statement.

The DHS said in a July 19 notice that the new policy is meant to harmonize existing policies that treated migrants arriving by land and by sea differently. Expedited removal has existed in US immigration law since 1996.

Previously, the DHS could designate illegal aliens for expedited removal “within 100 air miles of the border and within 14 days of their date of entry regardless of the alien’s method of arrival.” The new policy allows DHS to expedite the removal of any undocumented immigrant anywhere in the United States, provided they are unable to prove they have been in the country less than two years.

The bishops called the new policy “unjust” and said it will stoke “fear in our communities.”

“The new policy will allow for the deportation of many more individuals without providing them an opportunity to seek legal counsel and have a hearing before an immigration judge,” he argued.

The DHS notice stated that undocumented immigrants can apply for asylum when they are apprehended, potentially delaying an immediate deportation until a credible-fear hearing and a determination is made, NPR reports.

“Even those migrants who have long-standing ties to the U.S. and have been in the country for more than the requisite two years required under the new policy may now be subjected to expedited removal if they are unable to prove such to the satisfaction of an individual immigration officer,” the bishop said.

The DHS is seeking public comment on the new policy.

 

[…]

No Picture
News Briefs

New York law bans revenge porn

July 24, 2019 CNA Daily News 0

New York City, N.Y., Jul 25, 2019 / 12:30 am (CNA).- New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has signed a bill criminalizing revenge pornography – the distribution of sexual or nude images without the subject’s consent.

Cuomo signed the bill into law on … […]

No Picture
News Briefs

Judge blocks Arkansas abortion regulations

July 24, 2019 CNA Daily News 0

Little Rock, Ark., Jul 24, 2019 / 07:01 pm (CNA).- A federal judge in Arkansas on Tuesday temporarily blocked several new regulations on abortion clinics, which otherwise might have led to the closure of the state’s last abortion clinic.

Distric… […]

No Picture
News Briefs

Priests protest Indian cardinal accused of covering up nun’s alleged rape

July 24, 2019 CNA Daily News 1

Ernakulam, India, Jul 24, 2019 / 06:00 pm (CNA).- Catholic priests are reportedly protesting Pope Francis’ reinstatement of a cardinal who is facing allegations of financial mismanagement and of failing to report the rape of a nun.

Cardinal George Alencherry heads the Archdiocese of Ernakulam-Angamaly of the Syro-Malabar Catholic Church, an Eastern Catholic Church in union with Rome and one of the two main Eastern churches in India.

An Indian television station aired an audio recording last week that appears to indicate that Alencherry may have been aware of a nun’s claim that a bishop had raped her, before the nun made her public complaint.

The nun in June 2018 accused Bishop Franco Mulakkal of Jalandhar of raping her in 2014 and sexually abusing her on multiple occasions over two years.

In a recorded phone call between the nun and Alencherry, alleged to have taken place before the nun filed her official complaint, Alencherry appears to tell the nun that he will deny knowing anything about the complaint if the police ask about it, and that she should deal with the apostolic nuncio instead of the police.

A Syro-Malabar Church spokesman said in a statement that the nun had not specifically mentioned the sexual assault during their conversation. Alencherry has denied that he recieved any sexual abuse complaints from the nun before she filed her complaint, but admitted that the nun had met him in 2017 and had brought concern to the cardinal but had not mentioned sexual abuse.

Bishop Mulakkal was formally charged with raping the nun nine times over a two-year period and faces a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, local authorities announced in April.

The charge sheet against Mulakkal included statements from more than 80 witnesses including a cardinal, three bishops, 11 priests and 25 nuns, according to Indian Catholic group Save our Sisters. He is expected to be in court this week.

Mulakkal maintains his innocence.

The Archdiocese of Ernakulam-Angamaly’s presbyteral council has also accused Alencherry of involvement in dubious land deals. Alencherry reportedly bypassed church law requiring consultations before a land sale that resulted in heavy financial losses for the church.

In June the Vatican suspended the administrative powers of the archdiocese’s two auxiliary bishops, all archdiocesan offices, and the archdiocesan council. A Vatican letter said Cardinal Alencherry “should absolutely not be involved” in any decisions, UCA News reports.

Pope Francis reinstated Alencherry in June. At the time Cardinal Leonardo Sandri, head of the Vatican’s office for Eastern Catholic churches, stated that Alencherry must now submit monthly financial plans to the Syro-Malabar Church’s governing body. The Syro-Malabar synod will meet in August to discuss longer-term solutions to the archdiocese’ financial situation.

The Vatican investigation’s findings have not been made public, and two auxiliary bishops who were suspended along with Alencherry remain suspended, the Associated Press reports.

According to the AP, about 450 priests, including 70 from outside of India, began a hunger strike and prayer vigil last week at the cardinal’s diocesan headquarters, in the city of Kochi, India to protest Alencherry’s reinstatement, the continued suspension of the two auxiliary bishops and to demand information about the Vatican’s investigation.

One of the protesting priests told the AP that the hunger strike ended after priests met with members of the Syro-Malabar synod and presented their demands, and were given assurance that the demands would be put forward during an August meeting.

[…]

No Picture
News Briefs

Mexican bishops: Government devalues migrants’ dignity

July 24, 2019 CNA Daily News 2

Mexico City, Mexico, Jul 24, 2019 / 05:19 pm (CNA).- The Mexican bishops reaffirmed Tuesday its concern over the lack of a humanitarian reception for migrants, whose dignity has been violated, and exchanged for “a plate of lentils.”

The bishops’ conference criticized Mexico’s lack of migration policies in a July 23 statement, saying that as a result, the country has submitted to the policies and impositions of the United States, “accepting the incoherency of tying business interests to the right and need to migrate, seeking a better life.”

“Sadly we can see that this dignity as persons and children of God is being violated, since it has been ‘exchanged for a plate of lentils’”, they lamented.

The bishops’ conference expressed their concern “for a truly humanitarian reception for our brother migrants, which reflects our convictions concerning the recognition and equal protection of the rights of all human beings.”

In June, Mexico agreed to take measures to reduce the number of migrants to the US, in order to avoid the imposition of tariffs.

Some 6,000 National Guard troops will be assigned to Mexico’s southern border with Guatemala, and some asylum seekers in the US will be sent to Mexico to wait while their claims are processed.

“A wall not only protects, but isolates from the encounter of one to another; erecting them is to let us be carried away by fear and uncertainty,” the bishops wrote.

“Walls are not only built with stones and bricks but also with negative attitudes such as deploying thousands of National Guard soldiers at our borders as a failed solution to curb migration; a wall does not address the roots and the true causes of the migration phenomenon,” they stressed.

They therefore said that the fight against poverty and inequality in their country and in Central America would seem to “be replaced by fear of the other person, who is our brother.”

Similarly, they emphasized that the Church and civil society have always stood up for “the non-criminalization of migrants and human rights defenders that are fighting against the flow for dignity and with significant risks to their own safety, even to their lives.” Additionally, that the dignity and human rights of migrants are to be held “very much above any negotiations.”

“The Church is convinced that a just immigration policy is necessary and urgent that on one hand guarantees an ordered, responsible and regulated free transit of people and that also looks after the legitimate interests of our nation,” they said.

They also explained that “hunger, poverty, violence and the lack of opportunities” are the causes of internal and external migration, which requires the “creation of sources of employment and the reconstruction of the social fabric.”

According to the bishops’ conference, thousands of migrants are waiting to cross the border with the sole purpose of fleeing violence and extreme poverty.

“So many others are detained or deported to Mexico, even more under the unilateral American program ‘Stay in Mexico’, under which thousands of Central Americans are hoping for a resolution of their immigration status, putting an electronic bracelet on them and restricting their movement to a specific place,” they said.

They also recalled that one cannot be indifferent to the suffering endured by migrants with the lack of humanitarian aid and who are “exposed to grave risks in the border towns, preventing their full and free access to legal assistance.”

The Mexican bishops enumerated five main points of concern: the defense of the dignity and human rights of all migrants; migrant raids in the US with the attendant danger of family separation; the threat of massive deportations from the US to Mexico; a new migration policy in Mexico based on containment and deportation rather than welcome; and the insistence of Mexican government agencies that shelters provide information on the migrants they serve.

“The Church, as a mother and protectress is concerned for and takes care of the poor and needy, and migrants are at this time, the poorest of the poor; the collaboration of the Mexican and American bishops in charity for this sector of society expresses their desire to continue to collaborate with all the initiatives that would permit finding a way for better security and protection of human rights of those who emigrate, and they raise their prophetic voice when these rights are violated.” they said.

Finally, they asked the Holy Spirit “to enlighten the civil authorities of our nations so they would make the wisest, most worthy, coherent and authentically beneficial decisions for our peoples, as well as  safeguarding the sovereignty of our nation, putting first the common good of man as a sign of human development, maturity and intelligence.”

[…]