The National Catholic Register reports on "comments and objections raised by several bishops" at the USCCB meeting in Atlanta that "challenged
the specificity of some heavily publicized statements", such as Bishop
Blair's criticisms in April of Rep. Paul Ryan's budget:
“There have been some concerns raised
by lay Catholics, especially some Catholic economists, about what was
perceived as a partisan action against Congressman Ryan and the budget
he had proposed,” said Bishop Boyea. That statement “didn’t really
further dialogue in our deeply divided country.”
In his view, statements that endorsed
specific economic policies revealed a lack of “humility.” He told the
assembly, “We need to learn far more than we need to teach in this
area. We need to listen more than we need to speak. We already have an
excellent, fine Compendium [of the Social Doctrine of the Church].”
Archbishop Joseph Naumann of Kansas City,
Kan., agreed that the committee was “at times perceived as partisan”
and neglected the principle of subsidiarity, which calls for solutions
that can be provided close to people in need.
Archbishop Naumann suggested that
drafters of the statement needed to rethink a tendency to advocate for
government assistance, and he said that the conference’s proposals
should not ignore the ballooning national deficit.
“Sometimes we’re perceived as just
encouraging the government to spend more money, with no realistic way
of how we’re going to afford to do this,” he observed.
A third statement, by Archbishop Allen
Vigneron of Detroit, echoed Archbishop Naumann’s suggestion that the
proposed document focus more on the family as the central social
institution and spoke of how the “disintegration of the family” had
fueled the demand for government assistance.
Read the entire piece.
One aspect of the principle of subsidiarity that needs to better
communicated and explained is how the principle is not just about the
smallest and the closest, but the proper ordering of social responsibilities
and relationships. The
Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church
touches on this point:
The
principle of subsidiarity is opposed to certain forms of
centralization, bureaucratization, and welfare assistance and to the
unjustified and excessive presence of the State in public mechanisms.
“By intervening directly and depriving society of its responsibility,
the Social Assistance State leads to a loss of human energies and an
inordinate increase of public agencies, which are dominated more by
bureaucratic ways of thinking than by concern for serving their
clients, and which are accompanied by an enormous increase in
spending”[400]. An absent or insufficient recognition of private
initiative — in economic matters also — and the failure to recognize its
public function, contribute to the undermining of the principle of
subsidiarity, as monopolies do as well.
In order for the principle of subsidiarity to be put into practice there is a corresponding need for:
respect and effective promotion of the human person and the family;
ever greater appreciation of associations and intermediate
organizations in their fundamental choices and in those that cannot be
delegated to or exercised by others; the encouragement of private
initiative so that every social entity remains at the service of the
common good, each with its own distinctive characteristics; the presence
of pluralism in society and due representation of its vital
components; safeguarding human rights and the rights of minorities;
bringing about bureaucratic and administrative decentralization;
striking a balance between the public and private spheres, with the
resulting recognition of the social function of the private
sphere; appropriate methods for making citizens more responsible in
actively “being a part” of the political and social reality of their
country. (par 187)
Read more on the Vatican site. The irony, I suppose, is that when the bishops and the USCCB weigh in on policy details and areas demanding expertise beyond what they possess as pastors and shepherds, they themselves violate the principle of subsidiarity.