The Dispatch: More from CWR...

What’s next for Cardinal Müller after puzzling dismissal from CDF?

It would be naïve to assert, like progressive Vatican watcher John L. Allen, Jr., that Cardinal Müller’s five-year term was up and so “[h]is service was up.” Cardinal Müller is 69, six years away from the retirement age for bishops. Nowadays, the pope extends many bishops’ tenure after they reach 75; Cardinal Angelo Amato, for example, is 79 and still serves as the prefect of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints.

Cardinal Gerhard Muller in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican in 2014 (CNS photo/Paul Haring) See POPE-AUDIENCE and POPE-JERUSALEM Nov. 19, 2014.

Like many Catholics concerned about the Church’s teaching on marriage and the family, I was disappointed to hear that Pope Francis has not extended the tenure of Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Regardless of the Holy Father’s actual motives for this decision, it will inevitably be seen by many as another sign of the declining fortunes of orthodox prelates in Francis’ Roman Curia. While the dicastery responsible for teaching and defending our faith has lost a brilliant theologian and courageous defender of the faith, upon closer inspection perhaps the situation is not as bad as it appears.

Over the past five years, I have become quite fond of Cardinal Müller. In recent years, too many prelates have been pushing a saccharine “Buddy Christ” vision of Catholicism that at best avoids preaching the Church’s teachings on difficult matters and at worst tries to make the Church a mainline Protestant denomination. By contrast, Cardinal Müller has always been a steadfast defender of orthodoxy. Although great pressure was put on him to accept his countryman Cardinal Walter Kasper’s call to allow divorced and remarried Catholics communion in certain circumstances, Müller always repeated that Amoris Laetitia cannot be interpreted in isolation from previous papal documents that make it evident that Catholics in new unions must live as “brother and sister” in order to receive communion.

“Only dead fish swim with the stream,” the British journalist and Catholic convert Malcolm Muggeridge once said. At a time when cohabitation is slowly replacing marriage and the LGBT and gender ideologies are beginning to be treated almost like religious dogmas in today’s West, Cardinal Müller is anything but a dead fish.

Additionally, Cardinal Müller’s theological oeuvre is impressive. He has authored more than 500 articles on theology and is the editor for Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI’s collected works. His Priesthood and Diaconate is the best explanation for why the Church only allows men to become priests I know of. Meanwhile, On the Side of the Poor, co-written with Peruvian theologian Gustavo Gutierrez, who was one of the founders of the liberation theology current (although his work was never condemned by the Vatican), is an intriguing work that shows that a Latin American theology of the poor that rejected Marxism and was instead faithful to Catholic social teaching could have been possible. His recent book-length interview, The Cardinal Müller Report, addressed a wide range of challenges facing the Church, especially social and moral ills. It made clear that Cardinal Müller does not share Cardinal Kasper’s negative view of heroic virtue among ordinary Catholics. “All of us know that we are sinners and that it is in the sphere of sexuality that human weakness obviously manifests itself,” states Cardinal Müller,

But this does not mean that the sexual morality taught by the Church is an unattainable ideal. The biggest scandal of which the Church is capable is not that there should be sinners in her, but that she should stop explicitly calling the difference between good and evil by name and that she should relativize that difference, stop explaining what sin is, or try to justify it by a supposedly greater closeness to and mercy toward the sinner.

Rumors of Cardinal Müller’s imminent demise were circling in the Catholic media for the past several days. It would be naïve to assert, like progressive Vatican watcher John L. Allen, Jr., that Cardinal Müller’s five-year term was up and so “[h]is service was up.” Cardinal Müller is 69, six years away from the retirement age for bishops. Nowadays, the pope extends many bishops’ tenure after they reach 75; Cardinal Angelo Amato, for example, is 79 and still serves as the prefect of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints.

That there was distance between Müller and Francis is obvious, despite the fact that the now former prefect has himself claimed that relations between him and the pope were perfect and that the latter did not extend his tenure for purely formal, bureaucratic reasons. The best evidence of this is that whereas the prefect of the congregation responsible for formulating and defending the Church’s teaching would have been the most logical choice to present Amoris Laetitia, Pope Francis instead chose Cardinal Christoph Schönborn of Vienna, whose stance on the question of communion for divorced and remarried Catholics has been much less clear than Müller’s, to do so.

The silver lining is that Müller’s replacement, Spanish Jesuit Archbishop Luis Ladaria Ferrer, appears to be a fairly orthodox prelate. Fortunately, the nightmare scenario that an ultra-progressive like Archbishop Bruno Forte of Chieti-Vasto would replace Müller has not materialized. With regards to the most controversial aspect of Amoris Laetitia, in 2014 Ladaria Ferrer, then secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, issued an official communiqué unambiguously stating that divorced and Catholics in new sexual relationships cannot receive communion. You can read the English translation of the full text here.

If Archbishop Ladaria has not changed his opinion on this matter in the past two and a half years, then this is reassuring. Perhaps Pope Francis’ falling out with Müller was not because of the latter’s views, but because he expressed them so vigorously and claimed that this is the only interpretation of Amoris Laetitia? After all, closer inspection seems to suggest that Pope Francis wants the question of communion for divorced and remarried Catholics to be “decentralized.” Perhaps his refusal to respond to the four cardinals’ dubia suggests that while he doesn’t want to unambiguously come out in defense of traditional teaching, he doesn’t want to openly endorse a change, either, and instead wants bishops to make up their minds themselves. However, these are just speculations on the part of yours truly.

While Cardinal Müller will now be less visible, he will still be a force in the Church for some time. At age 69, he can still participate in conclaves for another 11 years. Given that Francis is 80 and has on numerous times openly said he is likely to retire someday, it is extremely likely that Müller will participate in the election of the next pope.

More important, it is likely that Cardinal Müller will be sent back to his native Germany to head a major see. As is widely known, the Catholic Church in Pope Benedict XVI’s homeland is in a state of catastrophic decline. Just one in ten German Catholics attend Mass regularly, while last year twenty (sic!) times as many Catholics left the Church as joined or rejoined it. Despite being governed by a Christian democratic party and having a pastor’s daughter as chancellor, Germany legalized same-sex “marriage” a few days ago.

Undoubtedly, much of this has to do with the German bishops, many of whom have openly rejected tradition and morality. Meanwhile, German Catholics pay a hefty “church tax.” While relatively few of them actually pay it, the fact that several million Germans do keeps a steady flow of cash to the German church. Thus Germany is filled with beautiful, well-kept but empty churches. The German Church is becoming increasingly like a secular charitable organization and less like a community of followers of Christ. Because of the ongoing state support, German bishops don’t have much of an incentive to seek out lost sheep. An orthodox prelate like Cardinal Müller perhaps could bring about sparks renewal in Germany, like Bishop Bruskewitz in Lincoln or Archbishop Leonard in post-Catholic Belgium.

While dismissal of Cardinal Müller undoubtedly upset many orthodox Catholics, his mission is not yet over. We might still see great fruits of his ministry.

About Filip Mazurczak 28 Articles

Filip Mazurczak is the assistant editor of the European Conservative and a correspondent for the National Catholic Register. His work has appeared in numerous publications, including First Things, The Catholic Thing, Crisis Magazine, and Poland’s Wprost weekly. He studied at Creighton University and the George Washington University.

12 Comments

  1. Since the teaching on the reception of the Holy Eucharist is not a custom but part of the Deposit of Faith, there is NO excuse for Francis to not clarify his own encyclical. As the above poster has said, this is not puzzling as Francis has gutted Mueller’s entire staff at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

    How can Doctrine be left up to individual confessors’ ideas on what they desire to do?????

  2. What’s next for the Cardinal is an interesting question. More than likely as the author suggests he will continue his ministry defending the faith in writing and speech. Whether he will address the AL controversy is the vital issue for the Church. An indicator may be in an interview he had with Allgemein Zeitung shortly after his dismissal from the CDF. “While the two didn’t agree on all aspects of the text [AL], the cardinal insisted there was no fight about it”. This quote isn’t clear as to who Cardinal Mueller refers to, the Pontiff or Card Ladaria Ferrer. The difference is significant. If it refers to disagreement with the Pontiff on AL it shows Mueller’s willingness to oppose him. That is a hopeful indication that he will elaborate now that he is independent. If it refers to Cardinal Ladaria Ferrer we have in Ferrer a yes man. Either way the scenario is abysmal. The more serious connotation is if it was the Pontiff that Cardinal Mueller disagreed with on AL. That would clearly indicate the Pontiff’s liberal position on communion for D&R v Mueller’s conservatism. And it would be an indirect response to the Dubia in favor of what the Malta Argentine German Bishops Conferences are implementing. The context of the statement points to the Pontiff. That is no surprise to many of us. That Mueller was presumably willing to confront the Pontiff directly on AL [there is other alleged differences regarding his rejected revisions of AL] indicates he may address the moral anomalies of AL directly.

    • Mueller is NOT a conservative. He’s already stated that he has no disagreements with Francis.

      The moniker “conservative” is not applicable in the present state of the Church. There’s nothing left to conserve.

  3. The author forgot to mention Cardinal Muller’s 800 page Manual of Dogmatic Theology, which is surely his most important work and certainly contains no heresies. As for Archbishop Ladaria, I have read several of his works and they are all orthodox. He specializes in Theological Anthropology which includes the doctrine of
    Grace and Original Sin. He also has an interesting book on the Trinity and he is very knowledgeable on the Fathers of the Church, especially St. Hillary of Poitiers, who also wrote a work De Trinitate, not as influential as ST. Augustine’s which is understandable, but important. Archbishop Ladaria did his doctoral thesis on St. Hilary. St. Hillary is an interesting figure as he one of the few bishops who didn’t give into the pressure of the Emperor Constantius on Arianism and paid for his fidelity to the teaching of the Church with exile. I can¡t see Ladaria letting heresy pass, but he may be more discrete and willing to apply Ignatian blind obedience to his new job.

  4. I do not suspect the new head of CDF will do anything to defend the truth of FC. He will do the bidding of the world-wide Jez-Kirk machine for its Jez-Kirk boss. The Jez have suppressed the papacy. Congratulations on another worldly conquest. The SJ are always well-positioned.

  5. John Allen is such a phony.

    What is impressive is his persistence in peddling false narratives for his 2 sets of readers: (a) the fellow Jez-Kirk travelers who need a narrative bath robe; and (b) the faithful souls who desperately want to find some way to believe the current immorality and de-Christianization is not taking over the Church.

  6. Here is why the Church in Germany and most of Western Europe is so decadent and decayed: they follow the author of this creed:

    “The God who sits enthroned over the world and history as a changeless being is an offense to man.” (Walter Kasper, God in History, 1967).

    Indicates that the writer doesn’t believe that St. James (1:17) was taught the truth by the risen Christ. Doesn’t believe in the apostles, scripture or councils such as Nicea.

    Jez-Kirk as opium for the humble parishioners and exquisitely appointed lifestyle for the decadent ecclesial elites jet-setting from one sumptuous conference to the next.

    A church which will reinterpret Jesus himself (as the head Jez let on earlier this year).

    Brazen, arrogant, mediocre and post-Christian.

  7. I know this sounds a bit cynical but one can only wonder if this is more of a chess game and right now we are only in “check”. “Checkmate” comes in less than two years when Archbishop (Prefect) Ferrer turns 75 on 4/19/19 and is replaced after a little more than one year and a half of relative peace and forgetfulness. That is what I would do if I were a true progressive; because that is what progressive’s do if their opposition is too strong at present but showing signs of falling asleep.

  8. My previous comment regarding Cardinal Mueller is hopeful. Not confidant that he will be different than what he was as Prefect of the CDF. A cautious subservient prelate more concerned with protocol and convention, maintaining position than affirming his office as defender of the faith. Especially if opposed. After all what else is a defender of the faith, such the example given by Athanasius, Irenaeus supposed to do? I quote noted historian Roberto De Mattei. “Cardinal Muller missed out on a precious opportunity to criticize Amoris laetitia publically, and in the end was dismissed, without even due notice. It’s true, as Marco Tosatti observes, that he is freer now to say what he wants. Yet, even if he did so, it would be the voice of a retired Cardinal and not that of the Prefect of the most important Ministry of the Church. The support of the Congregation of the Faith for the four Cardinals, who continue on their path, would have been ruinous for those who today are leading the Revolution in the Church and Pope Francis has been able to avoid that. The moral of this story is that those who do not fight in order not to lose, after conceding, they experience defeat”. As De Mattei rightly asserts Mueller’s unwillingness to not only support the Four Cardinals, but actually criticize them as ideologues causing a schism was extremely harmful for the faithful during this crisis of faith. I hope he redeems himself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*